The influence of Indonesian realistic mathematics learning (PMRI) basedethnomathematicson the improvement of mathematical communication skills in terms of gender

Penulis

  • Teti Trisnawati Universitas Primagraha
  • Dwi Yulianto STKIP La Tansa Mashiro
  • Eva Fitria Ningsih Universitas Primagraha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v13i3.3320

Kata Kunci:

Komunikasi Matematis, PMRI, Jenis Kelamin

Abstrak

This research is motivated by the low mathematical communication skills of students at school which causes students to be less involved in learning or students are rarely given the opportunity to ask questions or express opinions so that students' mathematical communication skills have not been able to be conveyed. This study uses the Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education (PMRI) approach to see the differences between PMRI learning and conventional learning models for increasing mathematical communication skills in terms of student gender. The type of experiment used in this research is Quasi Experiment Design using pretest and posttest. The population of this study were students of class VIII Al Sudais Indonesia Foundation. The sample used was 2 classes selected by cluster random sampling technique, namely 1 class as an experimental class with the PMRI approach and 1 class as a control class with conventional learning. The data collection technique used is a test. Analysis of the data used is the normalize gain test, two-way ANOVA test, t-test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. The findings of this study are: a) the mathematical communication ability of students between those who take mathematics learning with the PMRI approach is higher than students who take conventional learning, b) the mathematical communication ability of male and female students between those who take mathematics learning with the PMRI approach is not. there are differences with students who follow conventional learning, and c) there is no interaction between the learning approach and gender differences in increasing mathematical communication skills

Referensi

Ahmad, M., & Nasution, D. P. (2018). Analisis kualitatif kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa yang diberi pembelajaran matematika realistik. Jurnal Gantang, 3(2), 83-95.

Ariska Yuliana Putri. (2014). Kreatifitas dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Bangun Sisi Datar Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 1 Arjossari Pacitan Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014 Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif dan Gender. Tesis. UNS

Armania, M., Eftafiyana, S., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Analisis Hubungan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis dan Minat Belajar Siswa SMP dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(6), 1087-1094.

Barton, B. (1996). Making Sense of Ethnomathematics: Ethnomathematics is Making Sense. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31(1-2), 201-3.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-undang RI No.20 tahun 2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Duch, B.J., Allen, D.E. & White, III H. B. 1999. Problem-Based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed in the 21st Century. Online: http://teaching.polyu.edu.pdf , diakses tanggal (13 Febuari 2022).

Ernest, P. (1991). The Philosophy of Mathematics Educations. Routledge Falmer: Taylor & Francis Group.

Fitriani, N. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis PMRI pada Sekolah Dasar di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(3), pp.1802–1810. https://doi.org/10.31004/jptam.v2i3.173

Fredlina, K. Q., Putri, G. A. M. A., & Putri, N. L. P. N. S. (2021). Penggunaan Teknologi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Matematika di Era New Normal. Jurnal Karya Abdi Masyarakat, 5(1), 79–84.

Hasbullah, H., & Sajiman, S. U. (2021). Persepsi Siswa Atas Pembelajaran Matematika di Era New Normal. Kopen: Konferensi Pendidikan Nasional, 3(1), 238–244.

Hendriana, H., & Kadarisma, G. (2019). Self-Efficacy dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), 153-164. http://jurnal.unswagati.ac.id/index.php/JNPM/article/view/2033

Lutfianannisak, L., & Sholihah, U. (2018). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Komposisi Fungsi Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika. Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2018.

Mullis, Dkk. (2019). TIMSS 2015 : Assessment Framework. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.

Ndiung, S., Dantes, N., Ardana, I., & Marhaeni, A. A. I. N. (2019). Treffinger Creative Learning Model with RME Principles on Creative Thinking Skill by Considering Numerical Ability. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 731-744.

Nurhayati, N. (2017). Pengembangan Perangkat Bahan Ajar Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Indonesia Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Fibonacci (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika), 3(2), 121–136.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018. Result Combined Executive Summaries. PISA-OECD Publishing.

Pinanti, Rosi Dwi. (2014). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika ditinjau dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan matematika, 3 (3): http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa.

Prayitno, Sudi., St. Suwarsono, dan Tatag Yuli Eko Siswono. (2013). Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Berjenjang Ditinjau dari Gender. Proceding Seminar Nasional Matematika. UNY.

Pugalee, D. K. (2004). A comparison of verbal and written descriptions of students' problem solving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55(1-3), 27-47.

Retnowati, P., & Ekayanti, A. (2020). Think Talk Write Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa. Sigma, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.36513/sigma.v6i2.863

Saptana, D., Supandi, Buchori, A. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa dengan Pendekatan PMRI pada Materi Lingkaran Kelas VIII SMP. Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), pp. 103-110 http://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php

Shirley, L. 1995. Using Ethnomathematics to find Multicultural Mathematical Connection: NCTM.

Sidi, I. (2001). Menuju Masyarakat Belajar: Menggagas Paradigma Baru Pendidikan. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.

Tilaar, A.R. (2009). Membenahi Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Trisnawati, T. (2020). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Realistic Mathematics Education dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika dan Sikap Siswa di SMPN 10 Kota Serang. Jurnal ABACUS. https://jurnal.upg.ac.id/index.php/abacus/article/view/91

Trilling, B and Hood, P. (1999). Learning, Technology, and Education Reform in the Knowledge Age or We're Wired, Webbed, and Windowed, Now What?. Educational Technology. May-June. 5 – 18.

Wijayanto, A. D., Fajriah., S. N., & Anita, I. W. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP Pada Materi Segitiga Dan Segiempat. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 97-104. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm

Yanti, R. N., Melati, A. S., & Zanty, Luvy S. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Relasi dan Fungsi. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik, 3(1), pp.209–219.

##submission.downloads##

Diterbitkan

2023-01-30

Cara Mengutip

Trisnawati, T., Yulianto, D., & Eva Fitria Ningsih. (2023). The influence of Indonesian realistic mathematics learning (PMRI) basedethnomathematicson the improvement of mathematical communication skills in terms of gender. Cendikia : Media Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(3), 552-561. https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v13i3.3320