Enhancing Physics Education in High Schools through Demonstration Methods
Keywords:
Demonstration methods, Physics education, High school, Student engagementAbstract
This research explores the effectiveness of demonstration methods in enhancing physics learning outcomes among high school students. A quasi-experimental design was employed, with students assigned to either an experimental group receiving instruction using demonstration methods or a control group receiving traditional lecture-based instruction. Pre- and post-tests were administered to measure changes in student performance, while surveys, interviews, and classroom observations provided insights into student engagement and perceptions of demonstration methods. Results indicate significant improvements in student performance and conceptual understanding among those exposed to demonstration methods. Additionally, demonstration methods fostered higher levels of student engagement, interest, and inclusivity, with positive feedback from both students and teachers. The study underscores the transformative potential of demonstration methods in physics education and highlights the importance of innovative teaching practices in fostering student learning and engagement.
References
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.
Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98.
Bigozzi, L., Tarchi, C., Fiorentini, C., Falsini, P., & Stefanelli, F. (2018). The influence of teaching approach on students’ conceptual learning in physics. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2474.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC higher education reports. ERIC.
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connections. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 599–607.
Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194–214.
Etkina, E. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge and preparation of high school physics teachers. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 20110.
Euler, M. (2004). The role of experiments in the teaching and learning of physics. In Research on physics education (pp. 175–221). Ios Press.
Fidan, M., & Tuncel, M. (2019). Integrating augmented reality into problem based learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Computers & Education, 142, 103635.
Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. P. (2012). Fostering a sense of wonder in the science classroom. Research in Science Education, 42, 985–1005.
Hmelo?Silver, C. E., Liu, L., Gray, S., & Jordan, R. (2015). Using representational tools to learn about complex systems: A tale of two classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(1), 6–35.
Hogan, K. (1999). Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1085–1109.
Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21, 1233–1261.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press.
Kozma, R., & Russell, J. (2005). Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence. Visualization in Science Education, 1, 121–146.
Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959.
Laws, P., Sokoloff, D., & Thornton, R. (1999). Promoting active learning using the results of physics education research. UniServe Science News, 13, 14–19.
Limón, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 357–380.
Lund, T. J., & Stains, M. (2015). The importance of context: an exploration of factors influencing the adoption of student-centered teaching among chemistry, biology, and physics faculty. International Journal of STEM Education, 2, 1–21.
Marshall, P. (2007). Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, 163–170.
Ruiz, R. (2020). AWE as a professional development approach in environmental education. California State University, Fresno.
Settles, B. (2009). Active learning literature survey.
Sever, S., Oguz-Unver, A., & Yurumezoglu, K. (2013). The effective presentation of inquiry-based classroom experiments using teaching strategies that employ video and demonstration methods. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3).
Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337–365.
Snetinová, M., Kácovský, P., & Machalická, J. (2018). Hands-on experiments in the interactive physics laboratory: Students’ intrinsic motivation and understanding. CEPS Journal, 8(1), 55–75.
Tilbury, D. (2004). Environmental education for sustainability: A force for change in higher education. In Higher education and the challenge of sustainability: Problematics, promise, and practice (pp. 97–112). Springer.
Trumper, R. (2003). The physics laboratory–a historical overview and future perspectives. Science & Education, 12, 645–670.
Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, E. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 381–419.
Wurdinger, S. D. (2005). Using experiential learning in the classroom: Practical ideas for all educators. R&L Education.
