Enhancing Poetry Composition Among Class VI Students: The Impact of Image Media on Creativity and Educational Implications
Keywords:
Class VI Students, Creativity Enhancement, Educational Implications, Image Media, Poetry CompositionAbstract
This study explores the transformative influence of image media on poetry composition among Class VI students, aiming to elucidate the role of visual stimuli in enhancing their creative expressions. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research juxtaposes two scenarios: poetry writing with and without the integration of image media. Through a comparative analysis, statistical data, qualitative insights, and anecdotal evidence, the study delves into the multifaceted dimensions of creativity, descriptive language usage, structural variations, and student engagement. Findings reveal a discernible impact of image media on students' poetry writing abilities. Statistical analyses indicate significant differences in creativity scores and descriptive language usage between groups utilizing and not utilizing image media. Qualitative insights corroborate these findings, unveiling nuanced themes of heightened creativity, vivid imagery, and emotional resonance in poems crafted with visual stimuli. Anecdotal evidence and thematic observations underscore the transformative potential of image media, fostering deeper personal connections and elevated levels of engagement among students. Educational implications emanating from these findings advocate for a paradigm shift in pedagogical practices, emphasizing the integration of image media to nurture creativity, enhance communication skills, and cultivate holistic learning experiences.
References
Andrews, M. (2014). Narrative imagination and everyday life. Explorations in Narrative Psyc.
Bereiter, C. (2005). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Routledge.
Billings, L., & Roberts, T. (2014). Teaching critical thinking: Using seminars for 21st century literacy. Routledge.
Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 161–184.
Burn, A. (2009). Making new media: Creative production and digital literacies (Vol. 32). Peter Lang.
Burnaford, G. E., Aprill, A., & Weiss, C. (2013). Renaissance in the classroom: Arts integration and meaningful learning. Routledge.
Deasy, R. J. (2002). Critical links: Learning in the arts and student academic and social development. ERIC.
Dedeilia, A., Sotiropoulos, M. G., Hanrahan, J. G., Janga, D., Dedeilias, P., & Sideris, M. (2020). Medical and surgical education challenges and innovations in the COVID-19 era: a systematic review. In Vivo, 34(3 suppl), 1603–1611.
Frank, J. (1945). Spatial form in modern literature: An essay in two parts. The Sewanee Review, 53(2), 221–240.
Hornbrook, D. (2002). Education and dramatic art. Routledge.
Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119–132.
Kilag, O. K., Dumdum, J. N., Quezon, J., Malto, L., Mansueto, D., & Delfino, F. (2023). The Pedagogical Potential of Poems: Integrating Poetry in English Language Teaching. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education (2994-9521), 1(1), 42–55.
Ko, J. W., Park, S., Yu, H. S., Kim, S.-J., & Kim, D. M. (2016). The structural relationship between student engagement and learning outcomes in Korea. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25, 147–157.
Malchiodi, C. A. (2018). Creative arts therapies and arts-based research. Handbook of Arts-Based Research, 68–87.
MALHOTRA, P. (n.d.). CLOSE READING AS A PEDAGOGICAL TOOL FOR DEVELOPING CRITICAL THINKING AND LITERARY ANALYSIS.
Marshall, J. D. (1987). The effects of writing on students’ understanding of literary texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 30–63.
McNiff, S. (2004). Art heals: How creativity cures the soul. Shambhala Publications.
Naveh, Z., & Lieberman, A. S. (2013). Landscape ecology: theory and application. Springer Science & Business Media.
Neier, S., & Zayer, L. T. (2015). Students’ perceptions and experiences of social media in higher education. Journal of Marketing Education, 37(3), 133–143.
Ryan, M.-L. (2015). Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. JHU press.
Simonton, D. K. (2009). The literary genius of William Shakespeare: Empirical studies of his dramatic and poetic creativity. In The psychology of creative writing (pp. 131–145). Cambridge University Press Cambrige.
Skinner, J., Edwards, A., & Smith, A. C. T. (2020). Qualitative research in sport management. Routledge.
Smith, B. E. (2014). Composing across modes: Urban adolescents’ processes responding to and analyzing literature.
Smith, H. (2020). The writing experiment: strategies for innovative creative writing. Routledge.
Taylor, C. (2018). The reliability of free school meal eligibility as a measure of socio-economic disadvantage: Evidence from the millennium cohort study in Wales. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(1), 29–51.
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.
