Application of pancasila industrial relations to the settlement of industrial relations disputes: Field study at PT Parkland World Indonesia Pwi 2 Cikande Serang
Main Article Content
Abstract
Industrial relations disputes remain a persistent challenge in Indonesia, often resulting from differences in the interpretation of workers’ rights, employers’ obligations, and the implementation of labor regulations. Although numerous studies have examined dispute resolution mechanisms from legal and procedural perspectives, limited research has explored the practical application of Pancasila values as a normative and ethical foundation for industrial relations at the enterprise level. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Pancasila principles in resolving industrial relations disputes at PT Parkland World Indonesia (PWI) 2 Cikande, Serang, and to evaluate their contribution to achieving harmonious, equitable, and sustainable labor relations. The research employed an empirical juridical approach using field research, with data collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis involving company management, workers, and labor union representatives. The findings reveal that deliberation (musyawarah), consensus (mufakat), social justice, and mutual respect constitute the primary principles guiding bipartite negotiations before formal litigation, thereby reducing conflict escalation and fostering cooperative industrial relations. The novelty of this study lies in integrating Pancasila as both a constitutional legal foundation and a practical dispute-resolution framework within a manufacturing industry setting. These findings provide theoretical enrichment for Indonesian industrial relations law and offer practical recommendations for employers, labor unions, and policymakers to institutionalize Pancasila-based dispute resolution as a strategy for promoting industrial harmony and preventing prolonged labor conflicts.
Article Details
Arcaropeboka, R. A. K., Kurnia, K. F., & Hefrianto, W. (2022). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial (Studi Perkara Nomor?: 11/Pdt.Sus-Pji/2016/Pn.Tjk). Audi Et Ap?: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 1(02), 135–142. Https://Doi.Org/10.24967/Jaeap.V1i02.1693
Ariq Shalahudin Al Fayed. (2022). Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement Of Pt Samindo Utama Kaltim By The Regional Office Of Manpower And Transmigration Department Of The Paser Regency, East Kalimantan. Journal Of Paradiplomacy And City Networks, 1(1), 54–65. Https://Doi.Org/10.18196/Jpcn.V1i1.2
Arpangi, & Sanni, T. (2025). Redesigning The Principle Of Justice In Labor Disputes. Journal Of Sustainable Development And Regulatory Issues, 3(2), 247–285. Https://Doi.Org/10.53955/Jsderi.V3i2.95
Dan, L., & Musik, A. (2024). Amicus Curiae Amicus Curiae. 1(56), 1807–1816.
Hukum, J., & Jakarta, U. T. (2021). And Regulation Governance Case Study Of Layoffs Of Pt Masterindo Jaya Abadi Vs 1142 Employees. 49–56.
Irawan, N. (2023). Studi Yuridis Normatif Implementasi Regulasi Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan, 18(1), 47–63. Https://Doi.Org/10.47198/Jnaker.V18i1.147
Jurnal, R. (2026). Revisi Jurnal Nazwa.Docx.
Justisi, E., Safa’at, R., Koeswahyono, I., & Djatmika, P. (2024). Industrial Relations Dispute Resolution Reform In Court: A Review Of Structural And Substantial Weaknesses In Law Number 2 Of 2004. International Journal Of Humanities Education And Social Sciences (Ijhess), 3(6), 3014–3024. Https://Doi.Org/10.55227/Ijhess.V3i6.1057
Justisia, P., Komunikasi, M., & Kajian, D. A. N. (2025). Pena Justicia: 24(1), 7681–7694.
Latip, A., Lu’luiaily, L., & Ainiyah, A. (2019). Mediasi Sebagai Penyelesaian Permasalahan Tenaga Kerja Di Kabupaten Bangkalan. Competence?: Journal Of Management Studies, 12(2), 65–89. Https://Doi.Org/10.21107/Kompetensi.V12i2.4950
Na’im, L. O. A., Amrullah, R., Aswandi, & Chandra, M. (2023). Penerapan Sistem Hubungan Industrial Pancasila Dalam Menyelesaikan Perselisihan Perburuhan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Sosial Politik, 01(02), 192–203.
Pamungkas, Y., Yurikosari, A., & Amriyati, A. (2023). The Existence Of Industrial Relations Dispute Resolution Institutions At The Close Of The Company (Lock Out). Devotion?: Journal Of Research And Community Service, 4(2), 582–595. Https://Doi.Org/10.36418/Devotion.V4i2.409
Perdana, S. (2023). The Government As The Intermediate In The Settlement Of Labor Disputes In Indonesia. Journal Of Law And Sustainable Development, 11(6), 1–22. Https://Doi.Org/10.55908/Sdgs.V11i6.1225
Politik, M. J., Humaniora, H., Christina, E., Lookman, W., Studi, P., Hukum, I., Hukum, F., & Surabaya, U. T. (2025). Esensial Imparsialitas Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Ini Dilakukan Dan Dikenal Dengan Nama Alternative Dispute Resolution ( Adr ). Alternative Dispute Resolution ( Adr ) Menurut Tulisan Dalam Buku Dwi Rezki Adalah " Sekumpulan Prosedur Atau Mekanisme Uang Berfungsi Memberi Alternatif Atau Pilihan Suatu Alternative Dispute Resolution ( Adr ) Menurut Laporan Penelitian Mahkamah Agung Adalah Konsep Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan Secara Kooperatif Yang Diarahkan Pada Penyelesaian Konflik Di Luar Pengadilan , Namun Kini Juga Berkembang Dalam Kerangka Beracara Bidang Ketenagakerjaan Mencakup Perselisihan Hak , Kepentingan , Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja ,. 3(September).
Puspasari, A., Meirani, W., Erwin, M., & Suroso, S. (2021). Penyelesaian Perkara Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Kota Palembang. Yustisia Merdeka?: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(1), 32–38. Https://Doi.Org/10.33319/Yume.V7i1.66
Rajaudin, N. V., Noor, M., Achmad, M., Aditya, R., Mustofa, A., & Kunci, K. (2026). Peranan Hubungan Industrial Pancasila Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik Ketenagakerjaan Di Indonesia Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial ). 3(4), 222–231. Https://Doi.Org/10.59996/Jurnalpelitanusantara.V3i4.878
Rizky Syamandiri, M. (2024). Juridical Study Of Industrial Relations Dispute Resolution Mechanism Due To Unilateral Termination Of Employment By Pt. Bisa Group. Syntax Idea, 6(5), 2082–2094. Https://Doi.Org/10.46799/Syntax-Idea.V6i5.3249
Saragih, M., Mansar, A., & Hanifah, I. (2024). Procedure For Termination Of Employment Relations In The Pancasila Industrial Relations Concept. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 23(3), 3113–3121. Https://Doi.Org/10.31941/Pj.V23i3.5315
Saragih, Y. S., Isnaini, I., & Hidayani, S. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Di Perusahaan Badan Hukum (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 68/Pdt.Sus-Phi/2023/Pn Mdn). Juncto: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 6(2), 377–384. Https://Doi.Org/10.31289/Juncto.V6i2.5233
Sitohang, M., Sinaga, H. S. R., Wijayati, R. A., Siregar, R. A., & Widyani, I. D. A. (2025). E-Court Sebagai Realisasi Asas Peradilan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Murah Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Honeste Vivere, 35(2), 217–229. Https://Doi.Org/10.55809/Hv.V35i2.574
Subiyanto, S., Endah Wahyuningsih, S., Hafidz, J., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2025). Reconstruction Of Employment Regulations That Are Integral In Realizing Industrial Relations Based On Pancasila Justice. Enrichment: Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research And Development, 2(11), 1284–1295. Https://Doi.Org/10.55324/Enrichment.V2i11.307
Sudiarawan, K. A., Yasa, P. G. A. S., Kasih, D. P. D., Dananjaya, N. S., & Damayanti, N. K. D. (2024). Formulation Of Online Dispute Resolution In Realizing Fair Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement: A Comparative Study. Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 227–248. Https://Doi.Org/10.29303/Ius.V12i2.1308
Sudrajat, S. A., Arzam, & Witro, D. (2022). Legal Protection In Labor Dispute Settlement Through Industrial Relations Mechanism. Khazanah Hukum, 4(1), 1–9. Https://Doi.Org/10.15575/Kh.V4i1.17027
Tinangon, E. N., Sinaga, T. B., & Mangowal, M. G. (2024). Negosiasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Legal Standing?: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(3a), 779–793. Https://Doi.Org/10.24269/Ls.V8i3a.10325
Yusticia, A. R. (2022). Hukum Anjuran Tertulis Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial (Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 68/Puu-Xiii/2015). Legal Standing?: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(1), 23–31. Https://Doi.Org/10.24269/Ls.V7i1.5570
Zulkarnaen, A. H., & Sanjaya, A. (2024). The Authority Of The Industrial Relations Court In Resolving Labour Disputes In Indonesia. International Journal Of Social Science And Human Research, 07(11), 8635–8640. Https://Doi.Org/10.47191/Ijsshr/V7-I11-59

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.