Work-skill development for death row prisoners: A labour law and human rights perspective
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines work-skill development for death row prisoners in Indonesian correctional institutions from the perspectives of correctional law, labour law, and human rights. The central gap addressed in this article is the absence of a specific legal framework that determines whether, how, and under what safeguards death row prisoners may participate in work-skill development programs. This study uses normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials are analyzed through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation, combined with doctrinal reasoning on the hierarchy of norms, restriction of rights, and state responsibility. The analysis shows that Indonesian correctional law recognizes prisoners’ rights to guidance, occupational safety, wages, or work-performance premiums, while human rights law requires humane treatment and protection of inherent dignity. However, the current framework does not specifically regulate death row prisoners, creating legal uncertainty, institutional discretion, unequal access, and risks of exploitation. The novelty of this article lies in the formulation of “custodial vocational protection” as a normative model that distinguishes rights-based work-skill development from ordinary employment and exploitative prison labour. This article argues that death row prisoners are not workers in a conventional employment relationship, but they remain legal subjects whose participation in correctional work programs must be voluntary, safe, non-discriminatory, psychologically assessed, fairly incentivized, and institutionally accountable.
Article Details
Armstrong, S. (2020). At Risk of Rights: Rehabilitation, Sentence Management and the Structural Violence of Prison. Critical Criminology, 28(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10612-020-09503-7
Auty, K. M., & Liebling, A. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Prison Social Climate and Reoffending*. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 358–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.1538421
Baffour, F. D., Francis, A. P., Chong, M. D., & Harris, N. (2024). Prison Overcrowding and Harsh Conditions: Health and Human Rights Concerns to Persons in Custody, Staff, and the Community. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 51(3), 375–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548231219803
Beichner, D., & Hagemann, O. (2022). A Global View of Women, Prison, and Aftercare: A Call for Reform. Violence Against Women, 28(8), 1788–1808. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012221085997
Bullock, K., & Bunce, A. (2020). ‘The prison don’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 20(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818800743
Death penalty in 2025 - Facts and figures - Amnesty International. (n.d.). Retrieved May 29, 2026, from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2026/05/death-penalty-in-2025-facts-and-figures/
Hamzani, A. I., Widyastuti, T. V., Khasanah, N., & Rusli, M. H. M. (2024). Implementation approach in legal research. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, 13(2), 380–388. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJAAS.V13.I2.PP380-388
Johnson, L., Gutridge, K., Parkes, J., Roy, A., & Plugge, E. (2021). Scoping review of mental health in prisons through the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-046547
Kalman, J. L., Burkhardt, G., Samochowiec, J., Gebhard, C., Dom, G., John, M., Kilic, O., Kurimay, T., Lien, L., Schouler-Ocak, M., Vidal, D. P., Wiser, J., Gaebel, W., Volpe, U., & Falkai, P. (2024). Digitalising mental health care: Practical recommendations from the European Psychiatric Association. European Psychiatry, 67(1), e4. https://doi.org/10.1192/J.EURPSY.2023.2466
Karthaus, R., Block, L., & Hu, A. (2019). Redesigning prison: The architecture and ethics of rehabilitation. Journal of Architecture, 24(2), 193–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2019.1578072
Mantouvalou, V. (2024). Work in prison: Reintegration or exclusion and exploitation? European Labour Law Journal, 15(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241270268;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:SAGE;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:ELLA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION
Misra, M., & Sikora, Z. (2025). Living on death row in India: The many ‘becomings.’ Incarceration, 6. https://doi.org/10.1177/26326663251385084
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/ACLJ.V4I1.24855
Nikoleishvili, K. (2025). Prisoners’ right to rehabilitation: Micro and macro level indicators for the assessment of the fulfilment of states’ positive obligation. German Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2025.15
Noor, A. (2023). Socio-Legal Research: Integration of Normative and Empirical Juridical Research in Legal Research. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 7(2), 94. https://doi.org/10.56444/JIDH.V7I2.3154
Phelps, M. S. (2011). Rehabilitation in the punitive era: The gap between rhetoric and reality in U.S. prison programs. Law & Society Review, 45(1), 33–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00427.x
Reagan, L., Kitt-Lewis, E., Loeb, S. J., Shelton, D., & Zucker, D. M. (2024). Health equity for people living in correctional facilities: Addressing bias, stigma, and dehumanization. Research in Nursing and Health, 47(4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/NUR.22405
Renzulli, I. (2022). Prison abolition: international human rights law perspectives. International Journal of Human Rights, 26(1), 100–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1895766
Stickle, B., & Schuster, S. S. (2023). Are Schools in Prison Worth It? The Effects and Economic Returns of Prison Education. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 48(6), 1263–1294. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12103-023-09747-3
Sylolypavan, A., Sleeman, D., Wu, H., & Sim, M. (2023). The impact of inconsistent human annotations on AI driven clinical decision making. Npj Digital Medicine, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/S41746-023-00773-3
Testoni, I., Marrella, F., Biancalani, G., Cottone, P., Alemanno, F., Mamo, D., & Grassi, L. (2020). The value of dignity in prison: A qualitative study with life convicts. Behavioral Sciences, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/BS10060095
Tonry, M. (2018). Punishment and human dignity: Sentencing principles for twenty-first-century America. Crime and Justice, 47(1), 119–157. https://doi.org/10.1086/696948
UU No. 22 Tahun 2022. (n.d.). Retrieved May 29, 2026, from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/218804/uu-no-22-tahun-2022
van der Valk, S., Aizpurua, E., & Rogan, M. (2023). Towards a typology of prisoners’ awareness of and familiarity with prison inspection and monitoring bodies. European Journal of Criminology, 20(1), 228–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370821998940
Waagstein, P. R. (2023). Unpacking Dignity for Death Row Inmates in Southeast Asia. Unpacking the Death Penalty in ASEAN, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_4

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.