Implications of civil procedure law reform on judicial practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
In order to address the persistent issues of complexity and inefficiency in Indonesia's judicial system, reforms to civil procedural legislation aim to enhance accessibility and streamline processes. This study examines the effectiveness of these reforms, focusing on challenges such as overly formal procedures and insufficient human and technological resources, using a normative descriptive and juridical-analytical methodology. The findings highlight the positive impact of innovations like e-court systems in simplifying litigation processes, though the success of these reforms hinges on addressing technical infrastructure, enhancing judicial human resource capabilities, and fostering a transformative shift in legal culture. Practical implications of this research include providing actionable insights for policymakers to prioritize investments in technology and training, ensuring that procedural reforms benefit all societal segments, including rural and marginalized communities. The study contributes to the justice system by offering a blueprint for creating a more inclusive, efficient, and people-centered judiciary in Indonesia, fostering greater public trust and procedural fairness.
Article Details
Afif, M. (2019). MEMBERANTAS KORUPSI MELALUI BUDAYA HUKUM YANG BAIK DAN CITA-CITA HUKUM DI DUNIA PERADILAN INDONESIA. SUPREMASI?: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.36441/supremasi.v2i1.107
Akhyar, S. (2019). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Asas Peradilan Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Berkaitan Dengan Yurisdiksi Pengadilan Negeri Sigli. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v3i3.12583
Amartya, S. (2012). What do We Want From a Theory of Justice? *. In Theories of Justice. Routledge.
Arifany, P. H. (2021). Analisis Implementasi Pelaksanaan E-Court di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrhki.v1i1.199
Block, W. (1996). O.J.’s defense: A reductio ad absurdum of the economics of Coase and Posner. European Journal of Law and Economics, 3(3), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00709143
Butarbutar, E. N. (2011). ASAS PRADUGA TIDAK BERSALAH: PENERAPAN DAN PENGATURANNYA DALAM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.3.175
Hamzah, M. G. (2023). Peradilan Modern. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada - Rajawali Pers.
Harahap, M. Y. (1997). Beberapa tinjauan mengenai sistem peradilan dan penyelesaian sengketa. In PT. Citra Aditya Bakti. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum Acara Perdata: Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, T. K., Prayuti, Y., Latianingsih, N., Damanik, A., Maheni, T., Farida, I., Muhtar, M. H., & Mustaqim. (2023). PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM. Penerbit Tahta Media. https://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/255
Hidayah, N. P., & Komariah. (2022). Upaya Peningkatan Literasi Hukum Masyarakat Tentang Peer to Peer Lending. Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.22219/jdh.v2i1.20914
Imelda, C., Damanik, P., Yakub, Y., Apriyanti, A., Kelvin, E., Apriyani, R., Erwinta, P., Susanti, E., Sukmareni, S., Attas, S. M. A., Yudhanti, R., & Rahmadanil, R. (2024). Hukum Acara di Indonesia. CV. Gita Lentera.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Meliala, A., & Rifai, A. (2022). Urgensi Reformasi Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Buletin Pemberdayaan Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.25273/bppm.v1i1.13114
Ms, Z. H., & Rizaldi, A. (2020). MERESPON NALAR KEBIJAKAN NEGARA DALAM MENANGANI PANDEMI COVID 19 DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Publik Indonesia, 7(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24815/ekapi.v7i1.17370
Pahlevi, R. R., Zaini, Z. D., & Hapsari, R. A. (2021). Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 5(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v5i1.2826
Pandiangan, H. J. (2017). PERBEDAAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DAN PERDATA. To-Ra, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33541/tora.v3i2.1154
Sarwono, J. (2011). Hukum Acara Perdata. Sinar Grafika.
Sundari, N., Luthfiyah, F. Z., & Rahmawati, W. (2024). Peran Hukum Sebagai Alat Rekayasa Masyarakat menurut Roscoe Pound. Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat, 2(01), Article 01. https://journal.forikami.com/index.php/dassollen/article/view/566
Suwito, Setiyawan, D., Muhtar, M. H., & Ahmad. (2023). Contemplating the Morality of Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(10), e1261–e1261. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i10.1261
Vinx, L. (2007). Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law: Legality and Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.
Waruwu, R. P. R. (2022). URGENSI REFORMASI SISTEM HUKUM ACARA PERDATA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KETENTUAN PASAL 136 HIR/162 RBG. Jurnal Pilar Keadilan, 1(2), 32–57.
Wijaya, A., & Saupa, T. (2014). Rechtsvinding Di Tinjau Dari Hukum Acara Perdata [Journal:eArticle, Tadulako University]. In Legal Opinion (Vol. 2, Issue 4, p. 151613). https://www.neliti.com/publications/151613/
Yudhanegara, F., Arifuddin, Q., Muhtar, M. H., Yani, M. A., Amalia, M., Judijanto, L., & HR, M. A. (2024). Pengantar Filsafat Hukum: Sebuah Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi Ilmu Hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.