Optimization of asset confiscation in prevention and eradication of money laundering
Main Article Content
Abstract
Transnational money laundering threatens economic stability and national security. One effective way to end this crime is to confiscate assets to stop the flow of criminal cash and prohibit their utilization. However, legal complexity, technological asset tracking hurdles, institutional coordination issues, and international collaboration issues hinder asset seizure in Indonesia. The lack of openness and accountability in seized asset management damages the state and lowers public faith in the judicial system. This work analyzes the asset confiscation mechanism specified in Law Number 8 of 2010 on the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering and other associated laws using a normative legal research technique with a descriptive and juridical-analytical approach. As well as the Money Laundering Law and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), this research uses literature, periodicals, and comparative analysis with foreign legal systems. This research optimizes asset confiscation and identifies legal, technological, and administrative barriers. The analysis found that although the legislative foundation is appropriate, its execution is difficult. Weak law enforcement cooperation, technical limits in asset monitoring, and legal loopholes that produce variations in the reverse burden of evidence principle hinder asset confiscation. Additionally, inadequate asset management repeatedly costs the state money. To improve asset management transparency and accountability, legislative modifications, cross-institutional and international collaboration, and contemporary technology are required.
Article Details
Ali, M. (2011). Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. UII Press.
Anisah, A. P., & Nurisman, E. (2022). Cyberstalking: Kejahatan Terhadap Perlindungan Data Pribadi Sebagai Pemicu Tindak Pidana. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 16(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.31599/krtha.v16i1.1047
Arief, S., Muhtar, M. H., & Saragih, G. M. (2023). UPAYA PEMBELAAN DIRI DALAM PERSPEKTIF PERSAMAAN DI HADAPAN HUKUM. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v16i1.475
Arifah, D. A. (2011). Kasus cybercrime di indonesia. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 18(2). https://www.unisbank.ac.id/ojs/index.php/fe3/article/download/2099/767
Arifin, R., & Utami, N. D. (2019). IMPLEMENTASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM ANTI KORUPSI PADA KASUS KORUPSI DAERAH. LITIGASI, 20(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v20i1.1353
Arrsa, R. C. (2014). REKONSTRUKSI POLITIK HUKUM PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI MELALUI STRATEGI PENGUATAN PENYIDIK DAN PENUNTUT UMUM INDEPENDEN KPK. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i3.32
Beaton, C., Lontoh, L., & Wai-Poi, M. (2017). Indonesia: Pricing reforms, social assistance, and the importance of perceptions. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Miguel-Sanchez-Martin/publication/317617063_The_Dominican_Republic_from_generalized_to_targeted_energy_subsidies/links/5943ad62aca2722db49cda88/The-Dominican-Republic-from-generalized-to-targeted-energy-subsidies.pdf#page=155
Denniagi, E. (2021). Analisis Ke-Ekonomian Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Lex Renaissance, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol6.iss2.art3
Fadilah, I. N. (2022). In Rem Asset Forfeiture dalam Bandul Asset Recovery dan Property Rights. AML/CFT Journal?: The Journal of Anti Money Laundering and Countering The Financing of Terrorism, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.59593/amlcft.2022.v1i1.23
Hamzah, A. (2015). Delik-Delik Tertentu di dalam KUHP. Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, T. K., Prayuti, Y., Latianingsih, N., Damanik, A., Maheni, T., Farida, I., Muhtar, M. H., & Mustaqim. (2023). PENGANTAR ILMU HUKUM. Penerbit Tahta Media. https://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/255
Huruji, R., Puluhulawa, M. R. U., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). PENEGAKAN HUKUM KEKERASAN SEKSUAL TERHADAP ANAK DI POLRES BOALEMO (Studi kasus Diwilayah Kepolisian Resor Boalemo). SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(5), 282–293.
Imran, S. Y., Apripari, A., Muhtar, M. H., Puluhulawa, J., Kaluku, J. A., & Badu, L. W. (2024). Existentialism and environmental destruction: Should polluters face criminal punishment or an existential crisis? E3S Web of Conferences, 506, 06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450606001
Khairul, K., Siregar, M., & Marlina, M. (2011). KEWENANGAN PPATK DALAM PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG. JURNAL MERCATORIA, 4(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v4i1.606
Lahmado, N. G., Puluhulawa, M. R. U., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). TINJAUAN VIKTIMOLOGI TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL PADA ANAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRES BOALEMO. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(6), 365–375.
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. (2011). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muhtar, M. H. (2019). Model Politik Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Harmonisasi Lembaga Penegak Hukum. Jambura Law Review, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.33756/jalrev.v1i1.1988
Muhtar, M. H. (2023). Sistem Pemerintahan Indonesia. Hukum Tata Negara: Konsep Dan Teori. Global Eksekutif Teknologi.
Nurhadi, S., & Hamzah, A. S. (2019). Konsep Hasil Tindak Pidana Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 7(1), 73–87.
OJK. (2020). Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dalam Mengawasi Maraknya Pelayanan Financial Technology (Fintech) di Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 9(3), 559–574.
Pakaja, R., Imran, S. Y., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). KAJIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANGKUTAN SATWA DILINDUNGI (STUDI PADA PUTUSAN PN GORONTALO NO. 72/PID.B/LH/2023/PN GTO. SINERGI?: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 1(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.62335/3j9d5q48
Pandiangan, H. J. (2017). PERBEDAAN HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ACARA PIDANA DAN PERDATA. To-Ra, 3(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.33541/tora.v3i2.1154
Puspitasari, D., Radita, F., Firmansyah, A., Akuntansi, J., Keuangan, P., & Stan, N. (2021). PENGHINDARAN PAJAK DI INDONESIA: PROFITABILITAS, LEVERAGE, CAPITAL INTENSITY. JURNAL RISET AKUNTANSI TIRTAYASA, 6(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.48181/JRATIRTAYASA.V6I2.10429
Sembiring, P. E. (2024). Menilai pemberlakuan pembuktian terbalik pada tindak pidana pencucian uang sebagai kejahatan proxy di dalam aset Kripto. Integritas?: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i1.1033
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.