Legal protection against debtors from forced withdrawal of motorcycles by creditors under law no. 42 of 1999
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A fiduciary guarantee certificate or deed is required for the execution or withdrawal of cars, according to Law Number 42 of 1999 respecting Fiduciary Guarantees. The question that this essay seeks to answer is: How are fiduciary guarantees governed in Indonesia? What factors lead to creditors forcibly retaking motorcycles? Regarding PT. Adira Dinamika Multifinance Branch 0601 Medan Graha Niaga's Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, how well-protected are debtors against attempts to forcibly withdraw motorized vehicles? This study employs a descriptive interviewing method in conjunction with an empirical research design. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources are used as secondary data in qualitative research, and the research site is the PT office. Branch 0601 of Adira Dinamika Multifinance, Medan Graha Niaga The Fiduciary Guarantee Law, the Housing and Settlement Law, and the Copyright Law all regulate fiduciary guarantees in Indonesia. Aspects of Debtor Default, The creditor may withdraw the object of fiduciary collateral in order to transfer fiduciary objects and prevent them from being freely surrendered. The inference drawn is that fiduciary promises must underpin all commercial agreements in order to provide debtors with fair and transparent legal certainty. The government and police have been advised to keep offering debtors legal protection when it comes to carrying out fiduciary guarantees.
Article Details
Ferindoni, F. (2021). ANALISIS YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP DEBITUR AKIBAT PENARIKAN PAKSA OBJEK FIDUSIA DI TENGAH JALAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG FIDUSIA NOMOR 42 TAHUN 1999. Jurnal Panji Keadilan: Jurnal Ilmiah Nasional Mahasiswa Hukum, 4(1), 77–88.
Frankel, T. (1983). Fiduciary law. Calif. L. Rev., 71, 795.
Haroen, R. A. (2022). Legal Protection for Debtors in the Implementation of Fiduciary Guarantee Objects Execution After the Enactment of the Constitutional Court Verdict No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(4), 2587–2594.
Indayatun, R. (2020). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KONSUMEN DALAM PERJANJIAN PEMBIAYAAN BERSAMA PADA PT. ADIRA FINANCE, Tbk. SUPREMASI HUKUM, 16(01), 27–26.
Karmila, K., & Jabaruddin, J. (2022). TINJAUAN HUKUM TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB DEBITUR KEPADA KREDITUR DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT DENGAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA. Lakidende Law Review, 1(2), 147–160.
Khairina, N., & Bustamam, K. (2019). Perjanjian dan Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 3(2), 307–334.
Kosali, A. Y. (2020). Improving the object of fiduciary guarantee according to law number 42 of 1999 on fiduciary guarantee. Journal of Sustainable Development Science, 2(1), 30–39.
Rahmawati, I. D., Udiana, I. M., & Mudana, I. N. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Pengguna Kosmetik Tanpa Izin Edar Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum, 7(5), 1–16.
Ramdhani, F. A. (2021). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KONSUMEN TERHADAP PENARIKAN DAN PENYITAAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUCIA YANG TIDAK DIDAFTARKAN KREDITUR. ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kemanusiaan, 15(1), 51–66.
Ruslan, M. T. (2021). Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Kendaraan Bermotor. CV. AZKA PUSTAKA.
Sindra, S. (2020). Kepastian Hukum Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia. Binamulia Hukum, 9(1), 45–56.
Ukus, Y. W. F. (2023). EKSISTENSI LEMBAGA JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN. LEX PRIVATUM, 11(2).
Usman, R. (2021). Makna Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Benda Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dasar Kepercayaan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(1), 139–162.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.