A critique and solution of justice, certainty, and usefulness in law enforcement in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 30, 2023
Keywords:
Benefits of Law, Certainty, Justice
Section
Articles
Statistics Article
Article View : 240 Times
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Indonesia, law enforcement agencies do not collaborate to achieve justice. Due to the legal institution's position and status, the Supreme Court is responsible for adjudicating and deciding cases, while the executive is responsible for investigating and adjudicating. Consequently, instead of striving to uphold the law in the public interest, they typically prioritize the interests of their respective institutions. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine if law enforcement and judicial justice can bring harmony to those seeking justice. This study aims to provide answers through the use of juridico-philosophical methods and literature studies by conducting theoretical studies of theories of justice and their relationship to the implementation of law enforcement within the judiciary. The findings indicate that power and other powers continue to influence the judicial system as an institution whose independence in upholding law and justice is guaranteed, particularly the influence of executive power and political power. In addition, the court's function as a law enforcement agency is not entirely autonomous, so the court's primary responsibility is to promote peace and justice in society. Therefore, in order to promote a sense of tranquility among justice advocates, it is necessary to strengthen the justice system, which is their final sanctuary.
Article Details
How to Cite
Romdoni, M., Fatma, M., Nurdiansyah, R., Suyanto, S., & Fahmi Lubis, A. (2023). A critique and solution of justice, certainty, and usefulness in law enforcement in Indonesia. Journal of Law Science, 5(4), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.35335/jls.v5i4.4269
References
Andrianto, F. (2020). Kepastian Hukum dalam Politik Hukum di Indonesia. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 3(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v3i1.114-123
Ansori, L. (2018). REFORMASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244
Antoni. (2019). MENUJU BUDAYA HUKUM (LEGAL CULTURE) PENEGAK HUKUM YANG PROGRESIF. Nurani, 19(2), 237–250.
Budimansyah, B. (2020). REKONSTRUKSI DARI PENEGAKAN UNDANG-UNDANG MENUJU PENEGAKAN HUKUM DEMI KEADILAN YANG SUBSTANTIF. JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA BHAKTI, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32501/jhmb.v1i2.14
Fartini, A. (2022). Politik Hukum: Otonomi Daerah Pasca Amandemen UUD 1945 Upaya Menjaga Keseimbangan Antara Prinsip Unity dan Diversity. PLEDOI (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan), 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56721/pledoi.v1i1.26
Hamdani, F., Putra, E. A. M., Akbar, D. A., Pangastuti, D. P., & Anam, F. K. (2023). Fiksi Hukum: Idealita, Realita, dan Problematikanya di Masyarakat. Primagraha Law Review, 1(2), 71–83.
Handoko, D. (2019). Klasifikasi Dekriminalisasi dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal HAM, 10(2), 145. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2019.10.145-160
Hosnah, A. U., Wijanarko, D. S., & Sibuea, H. P. (2021). Karakteristik lmu Hukum dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif (D. Safitri, Ed.; 1st ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Irwan, I., Perdana, F. W., Latuheru, P. M., Khairani, M., & Kartini, S. (2021). Pemikiran Tokoh Pakar Hukum Lima Paradigma. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 2(12), 2166–2178. https://doi.org/10.36418/jiss.v2i12.497
Khosyi’ah, S. (2021). NORMA IDEAL HAKIM DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Istinbath, 20(1), 74–90.
Lisma, L. (2019). Progressive Law Functions In Realizing Justice In Indonesia. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 19(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.18592/sy.v19i1.2543
Mochtar, Z. A. (2015). Antinomi dalam Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Hasanuddin Law Review, 1(3), 316. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v1i3.112
Moho, H. (2019). Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia Menurut Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan dan Kemanfaatan. Jurnal Warta, 59.
Muhammad, M. (2020). LEGAL DEVELOPMENT AND GLOBALIZATION: LAW ENFORCEMENT AND DEMOCRACY. Meraja Journal, 3(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.33080/mrj.v3i1.88
Nurudin, A. (2016). DISKRESI YUDISIAL: ANTARA KEADILAN DAN PENCITRAAN. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.45.1.2016.18-24
Priyana, Y., Assayuti, A. A., & Romdoni, M. (2023). Exploring the Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practice in Criminal Law System. West Science Law and Human Rights, 1(03), 107–114. https://doi.org/10.58812/wslhr.v1i03.120
Putri, K. D. A., & Arifin, R. (2019). TINJAUAN TEORITIS KEADILAN DAN KEPASTIAN DALAM HUKUM DI INDONESIA (The Theoretical Review of Justice and Legal Certainty in Indonesia). MIMBAR YUSTITIA, 2(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v2i2.1344
Romdoni, M., Fathullah, Fatma, M., & Darwis, Z. (2023). Inconsistency in judges’ legal considerations addressing special narcotics crimes. The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research, 11(1), 188–194.
Romdoni, M., WN, S. F., & Nurdiansyah, R. (2022). Impact Of Political Policy On The Implementation Of Law Enforcement. Mediation: Journal of Law, 1(2), 67–74.
Rumega, I. W. G. (2019). Hakim Komisaris dan Miscarriage of Justice dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 19(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.53-68
Siregar, N. F. (2018). Efektivitas Hukum. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(2), 1–16.
Supriyono. (2016). The Delivery Of Justice, The Behavior And The Use Of Life In Life Community. Jurnal Ilmiah Fenomena, 14(2), 1567–1582.
Suramin, S. (2021). Indonesian Anti-Corruption Law Enforcement: Current Problems and Challenges. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v2i2.46612
Toule, E. R. M. (2022). Rule of Law and Rule of Ethic in Law Enforcement in Indonesia. SASI, 28(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i1.752
Wantu, F. (2012). MEWUJUDKAN KEPASTIAN HUKUM, KEADILAN DAN KEMANFAATAN DALAM PUTUSAN HAKIM DI PERADILAN PERDATA. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121
Copyright and Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.