Harmonization of the rome statute in the establishment of a human rights court in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The establishment of a Human Rights Court is necessary as there are gross violations of human rights in a country including Indonesia. Indonesia has harmonized the Rome Statute which is considered as the spearhead of the establishment of the Human Rights Court in Indonesia so that law enforcement against gross violations of human rights can be implemented. Therefore, this study aims to analyze and find out about the form of legal harmonization in the Human Rights Court in Indonesia and how the implementation and enforcement of law in the Human Rights Court in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative using a statutory approach and a case approach which is then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The results showed that the Harmonization of the Rome Statute in the establishment of the Human Rights Court in Indonesia was carried out partially or there were differences or deviations from the Rome Statute, namely in the Human Rights Court in Indonesia only regulates crimes against humanity, genocide, and the Ad Hoc Human Rights Court established under the Human Rights Court Law. The form of implementation and enforcement in cases of gross violations of human rights in the Human Rights Court in Indonesia has not been running properly because there are still several cases of gross violations of human rights that have not been handled until now.
Article Details
Aristeus, S. (2018). TRANSPLANTASI HUKUM BISNIS DI ERA GLOBALISASI TANTANGAN BAGI INDONESIA (Transplantation of Business Law in Globalization Era A Challenge for Indonesia) Syprianus. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(4), 513–523. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/521
Ervita, M. (2017). Teori Pertanggungjawaban Komando (Command Responsibility)?: Studi Kasus Kurt Meyer di Pengadilan Militer Kanada. SIMBUR CAHAYA?: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 24(2), 4828–4843. http://journal.fh.unsri.ac.id/index.php/simburcahaya/article/view/58
Firdiansyah, F. (2021). Peran dan Harapan Korban untuk Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Berat HAM Masa Lalu. Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia, 13(13), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.58823/jham.v13i13.99
Fitriana, M. K. (2015). PERANAN POLITIK HUKUM DALAM PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA SEBAGAI SARANA MEWUJUDKAN TUJUAN NEGARA ( LAWS AND REGULATIONS IN INDONESIA AS THE MEANS OF REALIZING THE COUNTRY ’ S GOAL ) Mia Kusuma Fitriana , S . H ., M . Hum Fungsiona. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 12(2), 1–27. https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/403
Gultom, B. M. (2012). Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat. Kompas.Com. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2012/09/12/0931234/Penyelesaian.Pelanggaran.HAM.Berat
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2010). Pengadilan atas Beberapa Kejahatan Serius terhadap HAM. Erlangga.
Indonesia, C. (2023). Daftar 12 Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat yang Diakui Jokowi. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230111104824-12-898847/daftar-12-kasus-pelanggaran-ham-berat-yang-diakui-jokowi
Irving, E. (2019). The other side of the article 21(3) coin: Human rights in the Rome statute and the limits of article 21(3). Leiden Journal of International Law, 32(4), 837–850. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156519000426
Juwana, H. (2021). Konsep Tanggung Jawab Pimpinan dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional: Kajian atas Penerapan di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol1.4.564
Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM). (2022). Pengadilan HAM di bawah Standar: Preliminary Conclusive Report.
Marzuki, S. (2016). Makalah Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia (Catatan Kritis Terhadap Pengadilan HAM Ad Hoc Timor Timur dan Tanjung Priok).
MD, M. M. (12 C.E.). Politik Hukum di Indonesiaitle. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Mertokusumo, S. (2008). Mengenal Hukum; Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.
Mosquera Valderrama, I. (2004). Legal transplants and comparative law. International Law Journal, 261–276.
Muhdlor, A. Z. (2016). The Study Of Politic Of Law Against The Adoption Of Law In Global Era. Hukum Dan Peradilam, 5(2), 195–208.
Nusantara, A. H. G. (2021). Penerapan Hukum International dalam Kasus Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berat di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol1.4.566
papua, suara. (2017). Pengadilan HAM di Indonesia. Suara Papua. https://suarapapua.com/2017/07/26/pengadilan-ham-di-indonesia/
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya.
Saptohadi, S. (2013). Eksistensi pengadilan hak asasi manusia dalam penegakan hukum di timor timur pasca jajak pendapat. Dinamika Hukum, 13(2), 345–354.
Smith, R. K. M., & dkk. (2008). Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia. PUSHAM UII Yogyakarta.
Sucahyo, N. (2022). Terdakwa Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Berat Paniai Divonis Bebas. VOA Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/terdakwa-kasus-pelanggaran-ham-berat-paniai-divonis-bebas/6867507.html
Utama, I. G. A. A., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2020). Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (Icc) Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Rohingnya Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3(3), 208–219.
ZULFA, E. A. (2012). Laporan Akhir Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Perubahan UU NO. 26 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM). In Pusat Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum Dan HAM RI.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.