Optimalisasi Penerapan E-Learning Dalam Pendidikan Nasional Berdasarkan Konsep Tata Ruang Daerah

Herman Meiky Koessoy; Henny Nikolin Tambingon; Viktory Nicodemus Joufree Rotty

Authors

Herman Meiky Koessoy Universitas Negeri Manado
Henny Nikolin Tambingon Universitas Negeri Manado
Viktory Nicodemus Joufree Rotty Universitas Negeri Manado

Keywords:

E-learning, Optimalisasi, Pendidikan nasional, Tata ruang

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara menyangkut indikator struktur konsep tata ruang Provinsi Sulawesi Utara berkaitan dengan penerapan e-learning dalam peningkatan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diambil dari teori-teori terkait. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa optimalisasi penerapan e-learning dalam pendidikan nasional berdasarkan konsep tata ruang daerah di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara telah mengalami peningkatan. Hal ini dibuktikan dengan dukungan fasilitas Base Transceiver Station (BTS) yang dibangun telah mengalami peningkatan jumlah, baik di daerah perkotaan maupun pedesaan, dimana di tahun 2020 pada daerah perkotaan jumlah menara BTS sejumlah 231 kemudian di tahun 2021 meningkat menjadi 250 unit. Sementara di daerah pedesaan di tahun 2020 jumlah menara BTS sebanyak 442, di tahun 2021 bertambah 11 unit menjadi 253 unit menara BTS. Persentase angka menara BTS di adaerah pedesaan di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara pada tahun 2021 adalah 64%. Lebih lanjut, kebutuhan sarana pendidikan standar akan mengacu dalam pengembangan sarana pendidikan dalam rencana tata ruang, meliputi jenis dan jenjang pendidikan yang dibutuhkan, jumlah satuan ruang belajar yang dibutuhkan, dan luas lahan yang dibutuhkan untuk membangun fasilitas pendukung. Peningkatan ini tentu memberikan dampak positif bagi proses pembelajaran, khususnya penggunaan e-learning. Dengan dukungan fasilitas tersebut serta penguatan internet sekolah di desa-desa, dan juga sebagai pendukung dalam kegiatan pengajaran dan pembelajaran guru dan siswa, hal ini akan berdampak pada penguasaan materi dan pembelajaran.

References

Al-Adwan, A., & Smedley, J. (2012). Implementing e-learning in the Jordanian Higher Education System: Factors affecting impact. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 8(1).

Al-Samarraie, H., Teng, B. K., Alzahrani, A. I., & Alalwan, N. (2018). E-learning continuance satisfaction in higher education: a unified perspective from instructors and students. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 2003–2019.

Albó, L., Hernández-Leo, D., & Moreno Oliver, V. (2019). Smartphones or laptops in the collaborative classroom? A study of video-based learning in higher education. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(6), 637–649.

Alhumaid, K., Ali, S., Waheed, A., Zahid, E., & Habes, M. (2020). COVID-19 & elearning: Perceptions & attitudes of teachers towards E-learning acceptancein the developing countries. Multicultural Education, 6(2), 100–115.

Ali, S., Uppal, M. A., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018). A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers. Information Technology & People.

Asnur, M. N. A., Adhima, F., Ayuwijayanti, M., & Marsuki, R. R. (2019). Karaketristik Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Bahasa Asing dalam Google Classroom. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Literasi Bahasa Dan Sastra Ke-4 Pembelajaran Bahasa Asing Di Era Digital, 1–11.

Azzahra, N. F. (2020). Mengkaji hambatan pembelajaran jarak jauh di Indonesia di masa pandemi covid-19. In Center for Indonesian Policy Studies (CIPS).

Azzizah, Y. (2015). Socio-Economic Factors on Indonesia Education Disparity. International Education Studies, 8(12), 218–229.

BTS. (2021). Banyaknya Desa/Kelurahan yang Memiliki Menara Base Transceiver Station (BTS) menurut Provinsi dan Klasifikasi Daerah (Desa), 2019-2021.

Budiansyah, A. (2020). Saat Operator Seluler Gratiskan 30GB Selama Corona. CNBC Indonesia.

Carliner, S., & Shank, P. (2016). The e-learning handbook: past promises, present challenges. John Wiley & Sons.

Chuchu, T., & Ndoro, T. (2019). An examination of the determinants of the adoption of mobile applications as learning tools for higher education students.

Datta, S. (2022). Evaluation And Management Of Language And Technology Literacy Barriers For Accessing E-Learning Services In India. Embracing Change in Business, Management & Social Sciences, 87.

Effendy, F., Kurniawati, O. D., & Priambada, G. (2021). Factor affecting E-Learning user acceptance: a case study of AULA. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1783(1), 12122.

Esterhuyse, M., & Scholtz, B. (2016). The intention to use e-learning in corporations.

Gunawan, G., Suranti, N. M. Y., & Fathoroni, F. (2020). Variations of models and learning platforms for prospective teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 1(2), 61–70.

Haryanto, A. T. (2022). XL Perkuat Jaringan 4G di Likupang Sulawesi Utara. Detiklnet.

Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. (2012). A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(12), 10959–10966.

Herliandry, L. D., Nurhasanah, N., Suban, M. E., & Kuswanto, H. (2020). Pembelajaran pada masa pandemi covid-19. JTP-Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(1), 65–70.

Hutapea, M. (2022). BPKP Malut Reviu Penyediaan Akses Pembangunan BTS dan Akses Internet. Badan Pengawasan Keuangan Dan Pembangunan.

Jazuli, A. (2017). Penegakan hukum penataan ruang dalam rangka mewujudkan pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 6(2), 263–282.

Koh, J. H. L., Chai, C. S., & Natarajan, U. (2018). Developing Indonesia teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st century learning (TPACK-21CL) through a multi-prong approach. Journal of International Education and Business, 3(1), 11–33.

Lin, T.-C. (2014). Combining the TAM and IS success models to validate e-learning system satisfaction and continuance intention. In Advanced Research in Adult Learning and Professional Development: Tools, Trends, and Methodologies (pp. 290–301). IGI Global.

Mashroofa, M. M., Haleem, A., & Jahufer, A. (2020). Moderating effects of academic position and computer literacy skills on e-learning portal usage: SEM application on theory of planned behaviour.

Meyfi, W. (2020). Optimalisasi Keterampilan Mengajar Guru PAI Berbasis Web/Blogger Dalam Meningkatkan Intelejensi Siswa di MAN 1 Kota Bitung Sulawesi Utara. Iinstitut Pesantren KH. Abdul Chalim.

Middleton, D. (2009). When Eric met Sally: putting the drama into ethics teaching. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 1(3), 1–37.

Mohammadi, H. (2015). Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 359–374.

Muttaqin, T. (2018). Determinants of unequal access to and quality of education in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 2(1), 1–23.

Noskova, T., & Yakovleva, O. (2016). Educational interactions quality in e-learning environment. In Handbook of Research on Estimation and Control Techniques in E-Learning Systems (pp. 216–232). IGI Global.

Oni, W. (2013). A Survey of Fundamental Theories, Models and Perspectives on Computer-Mediated Communication. African Nebula, 6.

Paat, W. R. L. (2014). Analisis Dan Pembangunan E-Learning Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Informatika Dan Komunikasi Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Manado. UAJY.

Pangalila, T., & Rattu, J. A. (2021). Pkm Pelatihan Penggunaan Perangkat Pembelajaran Daring Bagi Guru-Guru Di Sd Katolik Sta. Clara Tomohon-Sulawesi Utara. ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 14(2).

Porter, L. R. (1997). Creating the virtual classroom: Distance learning with the Internet.

Pramadhani, D. H. (2022). Framing Pemberitaan Kesenjangan Digital di Daerah 3T (Terdepan, Terluar dan Tertinggal) pada Media Online. Jurnal Ilmu Siber (JIS), 1(3), 91–96.

Pyetan, E., Oni-Grinberg, A., Nevo, U., Haisraeli, A., & Yankielowicz, S. (2013). Higher scientific education for the talented youth-Motivating scientific pursuit and laying the ground for academic and creative research. 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), 429–432.

Qodriyatun, S. N. (2020). Bencana Banjir: Pengawasan dan Pengendalian Pemanfaatan Ruang Berdasarkan UU Penataan Ruang dan RUU Cipta Kerja. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 11(1), 29–42.

Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M., & Martínez, F. J. (2006). Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(8), 683–696.

Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Psychology Press.

Sawang, S., Newton, C., & Jamieson, K. (2013). Increasing learners’ satisfaction/intention to adopt more e?learning. Education+ Training.

Sela, O. (2013). Old concepts, new tools: an action research project on computer-supported collaborative learning in teacher education. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(3), 418.

Sharifov, M., & Mustafa, A. S. (2020). Review of Prevailing Trends, Barriers and Future Perspectives of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) in Higher Institutions. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 10(3), 166.

Sife, A., Lwoga, E., & Sanga, C. (2007). New technologies for teaching and learning: Challenges for higher learning institutions in developing countries. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT, 3(2), 57–67.

Siritongthaworn, S., Krairit, D., Dimmitt, N. J., & Paul, H. (2006). The study of e-learning technology implementation: A preliminary investigation of universities in Thailand. Education and Information Technologies, 11(2), 137–160.

Smith, G. G., & Taveras, M. (2005). The missing instructor: Does e-learning promote absenteeism? Elearn, 2005(1), 1.

Tanos, K. (2020). Akses Pendidikan bagi yang Tertinggal. Sindonews.Com.

Titie, P., Suthathip, S., Youji, K., Pornpimol, C., & Thepchai, S. (2018). Effectiveness of ELearning Design and Affecting Variables in Thai Public Schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 1–34.

Vate-U-Lan, P. (2007). Readiness of eLearning connectivity in Thailand. Fourth International Conference on ELearning for Knowledge-Based Society, 18–19.

Vencatachellum, I., & Munusami, V. (2006). Barriers to effective corporate e-learning in Mauritius. Availablefrom: Http://Www. Ufhrd. Co. Uk/Wordpress/Wp-Content/Uploads/2008/06/11_ Vencatachellum _munusami. Pdf.

Waldopo, W. (2013). Studi Evaluatif Respon Terhadap Tik Untuk Pembelajaran Di Daerah Perbatasan Evaluatif Study Response Toward ICT For Learning In The Border Area. Jurnal Teknodik, 19–31.

Zhao, X., Wang, J., Wang, M., Li, X., Gao, X., & Huang, C. (2020). A new model for assessing the impact of environmental psychology, e-learning, learning style and school design on the behavior of elementary students. Kybernetes.