The Validity of Cloze Test in Measuring Reading Comprehension of The Students
Case Study SMP Swasta Bharlind School Medan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v11i2.1666Keywords:
Validity, Cloze Test, Measuring ReadingAbstract
This study deals with validity of cloze test in measuring reading comprehension. The objectives are to find out cloze test of fixed or variable deletion a valid measure of reading comprehension, and to find out to which level of reading comprehension is cloze test most valid. This was an export facto quantitative study. In this study, the writer took 40 students at SMP Swasta Bharlind School Medan, as the sample and they were divided into two grows. There are six hypotheses in this study in order to answer the research problems. Cloze test and TOEFL test were used as the instrument for collecting the data. The findings were that cloze test using fixed-ratio method significantly correlate with reading comprehension of TOEFL and also with literal and inferential comprehension items of TOEFL in measuring reading comprehension. And the cloze test using variable-ratio method significantly correlate with reading comprehension of TOEFL but doesn’t significantly correlate with both literal and inferential comprehension items of TOEFL in measuring reading comprehension. Then, cloze test using fixed-ratio method is a valid measure of reading comprehension (0,77), while cloze test using variable-ratio method is not a valid measure reading comprehension (0,69). Mean while cloze test using variable-ratio method does not significantly correlate with inferential comprehension items of TOEFL in measuring reading comprehension.
References
Aggarwal, J.C. 2002. Essentials of Examination System: Evaluation, Tests and Measurement. New Delhi : Vikas.
Alexander, Estill J. 1988. Teaching Reading. Boston: Scott, Forest man and Company.
Arikunto, S. 1992. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakasta : Bina Aksara.
Aruan, D. M. 2002. Penafsiran Skor Tes. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan, Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni.
Baker, David. 1989. Language Testing: A Critical Survey and Practical Guide. London: University of Bahrain English Language Unit.
Best, J.W. 1981. Research in Education. New York: Prentice Hall.
Borg, W. and Gall, M. 1983. Educational Research. New York: Longman.
Burns, Roe and Ross. 1984. Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Cohen, Andrew D. 1980. Testing Language Ability in the Classroom. Massachusetts: Newbury House.
Gage, N. L and Berliner, D.C. 1984. Educational Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
GBPP Kurikulum Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris SMU. 1994. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Gronlound, Norman. E. 1985. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. New York: Prentice Hall.
Heaton, J.B. 1975. Writing English Language Tests. London: Long man Group.
Oller, Jr. John, W. 1979. Language Tests at School. London: Long man Group.
Sauvignon, Sandra. 1983. Communicative Competence: Theory and Classroom Practice. Massachusetts: Addison – Wesley.
Smith, R. and Johnson, D. 1980. Teaching Children to Read. Massachusetts: Addison – Wesley.
Tinambunan, W. Evaluation of Student Achievement. Jakarta: DEPDIKBUD.
Valetta, R. 1977. Modern Language Testing. New York: Hancourt Brace Jovanovich.
Wallace, G. and Larsen, S. Educational Assessment of Learning Problems: Testing for Teaching. Boston: Ally and Bacon.
Weir, Cyril J. 1990. Communicative Language Testing. New York: Prentice Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Cendikia : Media Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


