Main Article Content

Afrizar Pane
Surya Kelana Putra
Surya Misauri
Melisa Melisa
Agnes Silvya
Febrianti Nababan

Abstract

This research aims to determine: (1) Effect of independence on audit quality, (2) Effect of experience on audit quality, (3) Effect of due professional care on audit quality, (4) Effect of accountability on audit quality. This type of research is descriptive research. The population in this study were all auditors working at the Public Accountant Office in the city of Medan. The type of sampling technique used in this study is using purposive sampling. The data source in this study is primary data. Data collection techniques using questionnaires. Data analysis techniques used multiple linear regression analysis with the help of SPSS version 2.3. The results showed that: (1) The effect of independence had a significant effect, (2) The effect of experience had a significant effect, (3) The effect of due professional care had a significant effect, (4) The effect of accountability had a significant effect on audit quality. Suggestions in this study are: to the auditor of the Public Accountant Office is the auditor must have a neutral attitude in carrying out their duties, increase knowledge and experience so that audit activities can run well, and have a careful attitude in providing income and have professional responsibilities in carrying out his job as an audit to be able to produce a quality and accountable audit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pane, A., Putra, S. K., Misauri, S., Melisa, M., Silvya, A. and Nababan, F. (2019) “PENGARUH INDEPENDENSI, PENGALAMAN, DUE PROFESSIONAL CARE DAN AKUNTABILITAS TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (STUDI EMPIRIS TERHADAP AUDITOR KAP KOTA MEDAN): PENGARUH INDEPENDENSI, PENGALAMAN, DUE PROFESSIONAL CARE DAN AKUNTABILITAS TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (STUDI EMPIRIS TERHADAP AUDITOR KAP KOTA MEDAN)”, Jurnal Mantik, 3(1), pp. 82-93. Available at: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/81 (Accessed: 17April2026).
References
[1] Agoes, Sukrisno. 2012. Auditing (Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan oleh Akuntan Publik). Edisi Keempat. Salemba Empat: Jakarta.
[2] Badjuri, Achmad. 2011. Faktor-faktor Berpengaruh Terhadap Kualitas Audit Auditor Independen Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) Di Jawa Tengah. ISSN ; 1979-4878. Vol 3.No . November. Hal : 183 – 197
[3] Christiawan, Yuluis Jogi. 2002. Kompetensi dan Independensi Akuntan Publik: Refleksi Hasil Penelitian Empiris. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol. 4. No.2 pp. 79-92.
[4] Fajri, Nisa Nafisa. 2014. Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor dan Independensi Auditor terhadap Keputusan Pemberian Opini Audit (Surver pada Kantor Akuntan Publik). Skripsi. Bandung: Universitas Widyatama
[5] Febrianti, Reni. 2014. Pengaruh Independensi, Due Professional Care dan Akuntabilitas Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Akutansi. 3 (1). Padang
[6] Fitrawansyah. 2014. Fraud Auditing Edisi Pertama. Mitra Wacana Media: Jakarta.
[7] Futri, dan Juliarsa. 2014. Pengaruh Independensi, Profesionalisme, Tingkat Pendidikan, Etika Profesi, Pengalaman, dan Kepuasan Kerja Auditor Pada Kualitas Audit Kantor Akuntan Publik di Bali. e-Jurnal Akuntansi. Universitas Udayana.
[8] Hanjani, Andreani & Rahardja. 2014. Pengaruh Etika Auditor, Pengalaman Auditor, Fee Aduit, dan Motivasi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi pada Auditor KAP di Semarang). Semarang. Diponegoro Jurnal of Accounting. Vol.3. No.2 Hal. 1-9.
[9] Haryatmoko. 2011. Etika Publik, untuk Integritas Pejabat Publik dan Politisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[10] Ika, Ardiani dan Ricky. 2011. Analisis Faktor- Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Independensi Penampilan Akuntan Publik. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Vol.3 No.2, 90-100.
[11] Junaidi, Nurdiono. 2016. Kualitas Audit Perspektif Opini Going Concern. Yogyakarta: CV. Andi Offset
[12] Malayu, Hasibuan. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
[13] Mathius, Tandiontong. 2016. Kualitas Audit dan Pengukurannya. Bandung: Alfabeta
[14] Mubarok, Abdullah.dkk. 2017. Kualitas Pelaporan Keuangan: Kajian Teoritis dan Empiris. Jakarta: PT.Balebat Dedikasi Prima
[15] Mulyadi. 2002. Auditing Edisi 6. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
[16] Pancawati, H., & Rachmawati. 2012. Pengaruh Due Professional Care, Etika, dan Tenur Terhadap Kualitas Audit. Fakultas Ekonomi Unisbank Semarang.
[17] Rahayu, Siti Kurnia, dan Ely Suhayati. 2013. Auditing (Konsep Dasar dan Pedoman Pemeriksaan Akuntan Publik). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
[18] S.P,Hasibuan, Malayu. 2013. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara
[19] Safaroh, Isnaini. 2015. Pengaruh Independensi, Profesionalisme, Rotasi KAP, dan Anggaran Waktu terhadap Kualitas Audit: (Studi Empiris Kantor Akuntan Publik di Wilayah Kota Malang). Journal Riset Mahasiswa. ISSN:2337-56xx. Vol:xx, No: xx.
[20] Samsudin, Sadili. 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung : Pustaka Setia
[21] Saripudin, dkk. 2012. Pengaruh Independensi, Pengalaman, Due Profesional Care, dan Akuntabilitas terhadap Kualitas Audit (Survei terhadap Auditor KAP di Jambi dan Palembang). Jurnal Akuntansi Vol.1. No.1. Hal. 7-12.
[22] Saydah, Cholidah & Bambang. 2015. Pengaruh Due Professional Care, Akuntabilitas, dan Time Budget Pressure terhadap Kualitas Audit. Jurnal Ilmu & Riset Akuntansi Vol.4 No.2. Hal.6.
[23] Sinaga, Daud. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Ukuran KAP dan Ukuran Perusahaan Klien terhadap Kualitas Audit. Skripsi. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro
[24] Singgih, Elisha M & Bawono. 2010. Pengaruh Independensi, Due Professional Care dan Akuntabilitas terhadap Kualitas Audit. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIII UJSP. Purwokerto.
[25] Sutrisno, Edy. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bandung: Kencana.
[26] Tb.Aman & Angga. 2015. Pengaruh Due Professional Care terhadap Kualitas Audit pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Vol.3. No.1. Hal. 563-568.
[27] Zuhrawaty. 2009. Panduan dan Kiat Sukses menjadi Auditor ISO 9001 (Sistem Manajemen Mutu). Jakarta: PT. Buku Kita