The influence of intensity and effectiveness of chatgpt use on critical thinking skills of students at the sekolah tinggi ilmu ekonomi YAPAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, particularly ChatGPT developed by OpenAI, have brought changes to various aspects of higher education, including student learning processes. Currently, ChatGPT is widely used as a means to obtain information, assist in completing academic assignments, and support understanding of lecture material. On the other hand, the high level of use of this technology has given rise to various views regarding its impact on students' critical thinking skills. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the effect of the intensity of ChatGPT use and its effectiveness on the critical thinking skills of STIE YAPAN students. The study used a quantitative approach with a survey method by distributing questionnaires to 193 students selected using a purposive sampling technique. The data obtained were analyzed using multiple linear regression methods with the help of SPSS software. The results showed that the intensity of ChatGPT use did not have a significant effect on students' critical thinking skills, as indicated by a significance value of 0.163 > 0.05. Conversely, the effectiveness of ChatGPT use was proven to have a positive and significant effect on students' critical thinking skills with a significance value of 0.001 < 0.05. In addition, the intensity and effectiveness of ChatGPT use together have a significant effect on students' critical thinking skills, as indicated by a significance value of 0.004 < 0.05
Downloads
Article Details
Chaudhry, M. A., & Kazim, E. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in Education ( AIEd ): a high ? level academic and industry note 2021. AI and Ethics, 2(1), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00074-z
Department, S. R. (2024). Indonesia: ChatGPT usage frequency. Statista. https://statista.com
Durratul Hikmah, & Badilatil Walida. (2024). The Role of ChatGPT in Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking in Academic Writing. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 11(2), 554–564. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.780
Ennis, R. H. (1985). A Logical Basis for Measuring Critical Thinking Skills. Educational Leadership, 43(2), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310376953
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. In The Delphi Report. American Philosophical Association. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315423.pdf
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
HAI), S. I. for H.-C. A. I. (Stanford. (2024). AI Index Report 2024: Public Opinion on AI and ChatGPT. Stanford HAI. https://hai.stanford.edu/ai-index/2024-ai-index-report/public-opinion
Hayati, S. N., Putri, A. F., & Rudiyanto, M. K. (2025). ANALISIS PENERIMAAN CHATGPT SEBAGAI ALAT BANTU PEMBELAJARAN MENGGUNAKAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM). Jurnal Informatika Dan Teknik Elektro Terapan, 13(3), 605–617.
Insider, B. (2025). ChatGPT weekly active users reach ~800 million (report, Oct 2025). https://www.businessinsider.com/chatgpt-users-openai-sam-altman-devday-llm-artificial-intelligence-2025-10
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lenaini, I. (2021). TEKNIK PENGAMBILAN SAMPEL PURPOSIVE DAN SNOWBALL SAMPLING. Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 6(1), 33–39.
Mairisiska, T., & Qadariah, N. (2023). Persepsi mahasiswa ftik iain kerinci terhadap penggunaan chatgpt untuk mendukung pembelajaran di era digital. Jurnal Teknologi Pembelajaran Indonesia, 13(2), 1–10.
Maulana, M. F., Gustami, M. N., Faturrochman, H., & Munawar, W. (2024). PENGARUH CHATGPT TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN BERFIKIR KRITIS MAHASISWA UPI. Jurnal Pengembangan Pendidikan, 8(12), 9–16.
Nahwiyah, S., Zulhaini, Mailani, I., & Mualif, A. (2026). Pola Penggunaan ChatGPT dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kemampuan Berfikir Kritis Mahasiswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Keislaman, 3(2), 113–120.
Nazara, R. G. (2026). Teknik Penentuan Populasi dan Sampel dalam Penelitian Pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Bahasa, 3(1).
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT. OpenAI. https://openai.com/chatgpt
Ridwan, W., Purnamasari, F., Hamsar, I., & Handayani, A. A. (2024). EFEKTIVITAS CHATGPT SEBAGAI ASISTEN VIRTUAL DALAM PROSES PEMBELAJARAN MAHASISWA JURUSAN PKK FT UNM. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Teknologi, 1(1).
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson France for the French edition.
Sofa, N. A., Kunaepi, A., & Nasikhin. (2024). THE USE OF CHATGPT IN IMPROVING THE CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION GRADUATES IN ISLAMIC UNIVERSITIES. EDUKASI: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN DAN PENGAJARAN, 11(2), 135–149.
Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M., & Rutecka, P. (2024). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22943–22968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitin Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R%D.
Susanto, P. C., Arini, D. U., Yuntina, L., Panatap, J., Soehaditama, & Nuraeni. (2024). Konsep Penelitian Kuantitatif?: Populasi , Sampel , dan Analisis Data ( Sebuah Tinjauan Pustaka ). Jurnal Ilmu Multi Disiplin, 3(1), 1–12.
Westi Bawarta, Faradika, I. U. S. (2025). ChatGPT sebagai Tutor Virtual?: Dampaknya terhadap Kemampuan Critical Thinking. JISKA: Jurnal Sistem Informasi Dan Informatika, 3(2), 101–105.
Widiarti, L., & Kasri, M. A. (2025). Efektivitas ChatGPT sebagai Asisten Virtual untuk Mendukung Produktivitas Akademik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi, 5(3), 1218–1224.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.