The effect of accounting conservatism, capital intensity and leverage on tax avoidance
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Taxes are a very important source of state revenue besides revenue from natural resources and income from other non-tax sectors. However, the revenue received from the tax sector is not in accordance with what is desired by the state. This happens because there are still interests that encourage individual and corporate taxpayers to minimize their taxes by means of tax avoidance. This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of accounting conservatism, capital intensity and leverage on tax avoidance in food and beverage sub-sector companies listed on the IDX for the 2019-2021 period. The independent variables used in this study are accounting conservatism, capital intensity and leverage, while Tax Avoidance is the dependent variable. The sample used in this study was obtained using a purposive sampling method, so that a total of 12 companies were obtained as a sample of 39 companies as a population with 36 observational data for 3 years. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis and hypothesis testing using SPSS 25 software. The results of this study indicate that the accounting conservatism variable partially influences tax avoidance, this results from a coefficient value of 6.965 and a significance value of 0.017 <0.05, causing H1 to be accepted. The capital intensity variable partially influences tax avoidance, this results from a coefficient value of 1.363 and a significance value of 0.011 <0.05, causing H2 to be accepted. Meanwhile, the leverage variable partially has no effect on tax avoidance, this is also obtained from a coefficient value of -0.061 and a significance value of 0.721 > 0.05, causing H3 to be rejected. Meanwhile, the simultaneous results of accounting conservatism, capital intensity and leverage affect tax avoidance.
Downloads
Article Details
Amin, Maria Qibti Mahdiana; Muhammad Nuryatno. 2020. “Pengaruh profitabilitas, leverage, ukuran perusahaan dan sales growth terhadap tax avoidance.” Akuntansi Trisakti 7(1):127–38. doi: 10.32670/fairvalue.v5i1.2233.
Artinasari, Nikita, dan Titik Mildawati. 2018. “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Likuiditas, Capital Intensity dan Inventory Intensity terhadap Tax Aavoidance.” Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi 7(1):1–11.
Astuti, Titiek Puji, dan Y. Anni Aryani. 2017. “Tren Penghindaran Pajak Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia yang terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2001-2014.” Jurnal Akuntansi 20(3). doi: 10.24912/ja.v20i3.4.
Dharma, Nyoman Budhi Setya, dan Naniek Noviari. 2017. “Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility dan Capital Intensity Terhadap Tax Avoidance.” E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana 18(1).
Dwi Sandra, Monifa Yuliana, dan Achmad Syaiful Hidayat Anwar. 2018. “Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsbility dan Capital Intensity terhadap Penghindaran Pajak.” Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi 1(1). doi: 10.22219/jaa.v1i1.6947.
Ghozali, Imam. 2012. “Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 20 (Edisi keenam). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro. Sugiyono.(2008).” Metode Penelitian Bisnis.
Ghozali Imam. 2016. “Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan program IBM SPSS 23 (edisi 8).” Quarterly Journal of Economics 128:1547–84.
Givoly, Dan, dan Carla Hayn. 2002. “Rising Conservatism: Implications for Financial Analysis.” Financial Analysts Journal 58(1). doi: 10.2469/faj.v58.n1.2510.
Hanlon, Michelle, dan Shane Heitzman. 2010. “A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 50(2–3).
Haryaningsih, Nanda Septy. 2019. “Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi , Salesh Growth, Leverage dan Kompensasi Rugi Fiskal Terhadap Tax Avoidance.” Skripsi-2019.
Hidayat, Agus Taufik, dan Eta Febrina Fitria. 2018. “Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Profitabilitas dan Leverage Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak.” Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi dan Bisnis 13(2). doi: 10.26533/eksis.v13i2.289.
Ikhsan, Arfan, muhyarsyah, Hasrudi Tanjung, dan Ayu Oktaviani. 2014. Metodelogi Penelitian Untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen.
Lanis, Roman, dan Grant Richardson. 2011. “The effect of board of director composition on corporate tax aggressiveness.” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.003.
Mulyani, Novi Tri, Fadjar Harimurti, dan Djoko Kristianto. 2020. “Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi, Intensitas Modal, dan Ukuran Perusahaan terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2014 – 2017).” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Sistem Teknologi Informasi 15(3). doi: 10.33061/jasti.v15i3.3689.
Pangestu, Sri Hardiyati, dan Dudi Pratomo. 2020. “Capital Intensity Terhadap Tax Avoidance Dengan Profitabilitas, Size Dan Leverage Sebagai Variabel Kontrol.” Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi Vol. 5:26–34. doi: 10.29407/jae.v5i3.14182.
Pohan, C. A. 2013. “Manajemen Perpajakan?: Strategi Perencanaan Pajak dan Bisnis.” Salemba Empat.
Puspita, Deanna, dan Meiriska Febrianti. 2018. “Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penghindaran pajak pada perusahaan manufaktur di bursa efek Indonesia.” Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi 19(1):38–46. doi: 10.34208/jba.v19i1.63.
Puspitasari, Dian, Anissa Hakim Purwantini, Betari Maharani Program, Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi, dan Dan Bisnis. 2022. “Growth dan Konservatisme Akuntansi terhadap Tax Avoidance.” Borobudur Accounting Review 2(1):23.
Putri, Elgariyana. 2019. “Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi dan Intensitas Modal Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Sub Sektor Farmasi yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Tahun 2014-2019.”
Rifai, Ahmad, dan Suci Atiningsih. 2019. “Pengaruh Leverage, Profitabilitas, Capital Intensity, Manajemen Laba Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak.” ECONBANK: Journal of Economics and Banking 1(2):135–42. doi: 10.35829/econbank.v1i2.48.
Riyatno, Dwi. 2014. “SPSS 22: Pengolah Data Terpraktis.” Priyatno, Dwi 3.
Sarra, Hustna Dara. 2017. “Pengaruh Konservatisme Akuntansi, Komite Audit dan Dewan Komisaris Independen terhadap Penghindaran Pajak (Studi Empiris Pada Industri Kimia dan Logam di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2010-2014).” Competitive Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan 1(1):63. doi: 10.31000/competitive.v1i1.108.
Savitri, Enni. 2016. Konservatisme Akuntansi: Cara Pengukuran, Tinjauan Empiris dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Vol. 1.
Sekaran, Uma dan Bougie Roger. 2019. “Metode Penelitian Untuk Bisnis, Salemba Empat, 2019 Jakarta.” E-Prosiding Hapemas.
Subaida, Novia Dwi Wulandari; Lita Permata Sari; Ida. 2022. “Pengaruh Intensitas Modal terhadap Tax Avoidance dengan Konservatisme Akuntansi Sebagai Variabel Intervening pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman di BEI Periode 2016-2020.” Prosiding Nasional 2022 Universitas Abdurachman Saleh Situbondo 204–13.
Sulastri, Susi, dan Yane Devi Anna. 2018. “Pengaruh Financial Distress Dan Leverage Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi.” Akuisisi: Jurnal Akuntansi 14(1):59–69. doi: 10.24127/akuisisi.v14i1.251.
Swandewi, Ni Putu, dan Naniek Noviari. 2020. “Pengaruh Financial Distress dan Konservatisme Akuntansi pada Tax Avoidance.” E-Jurnal Akuntansi 30(7). doi: 10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i07.p05.
Syamsuddin, Muhammad, dan Trisni Suryarini. 2019. “Analisis Pengaruh Intensitas Modal, Intensitas Persediaan, Komisaris Independen dan Kepemilikan Manajerial terhadap ETR.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu 12(2). doi: 10.35448/jrat.v12i2.5950.
Syamsuddin, Muhammad, dan Trisni Suryarini. 2020. “Analisis Pengaruh Intensitas Modal, Intensitas Persediaan, Komisaris Independen dan Kepemilikan Manajerial Terhadap ETR.” Jurnal Penelitan Ekonomi dan Bisnis 5(1). doi: 10.33633/jpeb.v5i1.2707.
Waluyo. 2017. Perpajakan Indonesia Buku 1 Edisi 12.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.