The unsuccessful of Satu Data Indonesia (SDI) implementation: a lesson learned from local government
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Data is a new asset in an organization. Data governance is needed for data to become a valuable asset. However, the implementation of data governance at the regional level, known as SDI has not been successful. SDI readiness score of 45.60%. Therefore, this study aims to identify problems and strategies related to the implementation of SDI at the regional level. Based on the results of an exploration of the implementation of SDI in the Madiun Regency Government, 24 problems were found. There are 3 problems in each aspect of SDI readiness. The eight aspects cover regulation, institutional, performance and conformance, management and utilization, technology, human resources, finance, and collaboration. To address these issues, eight strategies were proposed, including strengthening policies, increasing stakeholder commitment, formulating clear guidelines, raising awareness, facilitating infrastructure, developing employee skills, optimizing budget allocations, and promoting collaboration. These strategies aim to ensure successful SDI implementation in local government by improving data management, stakeholder involvement, resource allocation, and performance. Continuous improvement is important for long-term success.
Downloads
Article Details
Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., & Daly, M. (2018). Data governance activities: a comparison between scientific and practice-oriented literature. In Journal of Enterprise Information Management (Vol. 31, Issue 2, pp. 300–316). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-01-2017-0007
Alhassan, I., Sammon, D., & Daly, M. (2019). Critical Success Factors for Data Governance: A Theory Building Approach. Information Systems Management, 36(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2019.1589670
Antara, N. (2022). Launching Portal SDI Kabupaten Madiun. https://jatim.antaranews.com/berita/653881/bupati-madiun-luncurkan-portal-satu-data-indonesia
Bappenas. (2023). Kesiapan SDI. https://data.go.id/kesiapan-sdi
Bayu, D. J. (2020a). Implementasi Program Satu Data Indonesia Terganjal Berbagai Kendala - Nasional Katadata. https://katadata.co.id/yuliawati/berita/5f6c878de0680/implementasi-program-satu-data-indonesia-terganjal-berbagai-kendala
Bayu, D. J. (2020b). Jokowi Tekankan Pentingnya Data dalam Pembangunan - Nasional Katadata.co.id. https://katadata.co.id/febrinaiskana/berita/5e9a498f59f50/jokowi-tekankan-pentingnya-data-dalam-pembangunan
Hagmann. (2013). Information governance – beyond the buzz. Records Management Journal, 23(3), 228–240.
Islami, M. J. (2021). Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan Critical Success Factors (CSFs). 10(1). https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v9i1.3750
Kamioka, X, L., & T, T. (2016). An empirical investigation of data governance: the role of accountabilities. 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.
Madiun, K. (2021). Madiunkab. https://diskominfo.madiunkab.go.id/pemkab-madiun-raih-penghargaan-sebagai-peringkat-pertama-dalam-implementasi-satu-data-indonesia/
Mawanda, A. H. (2020). Satu Data Indonesia: Antara Ada dan Tiada. Suarakata. https://www.suarakarya.id/detail/111198/Satu-Data-Indonesia-Antara-Ada-Dan-Tiada
Nugroho, Y. (2017). After Data Synchronising and Sharing - What Do We Learn? Lesson from Satu Data.
OGP. (2020). Open Government Partnership Independent Reporting Mechanism Indonesia?: Comments received on the Design Report for the Fifth OGP action plan ( 2018-2020 ).
Otto, B. (2011). Organizing Data Governance: Findings from the telecommunications industry and consequences for large service providers. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 29(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02903
Patra, R. (2020). Mekanisme Pelaporan Independen (IRM): Laporan Perancangan Indonesia 2018–2020. In Peneliti Independen. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Indonesia_Design_Report_2018-2020_ID.pdf
Rasouli, R, E., J.J, T., R.J, K., & P.W.J., G. (2016). Information governance as a dynamic capability in service oriented business networking. Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, 456–468.
Retnowati. (2018). Prinsip-Prinsip Open Government Data. 25–29.
Sayogo, D. S., & Yuli, S. B. C. (2018). Critical success factors of open government and open data at local government level in Indonesia. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 14(2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.2018040103
SDI. (2021). Tentang Satu Data Indonesia.
Steward, D. (2020). Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Australia Design Report 2018 – 2020.
Tallon, P. P., Ramirez, R. V., & Short, J. E. (2013). The information artifact in IT governance: Toward a theory of information governance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300306
Weber, K., Otto, B., & Österle, H. (2009). Ones size does not fit all -A contingency approach to data governance. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/1515693.1515696
Wicaksono, B., Rusdianto, D. S., & Hendra Brata, A. (2018). Pengembangan Sistem Portal Satu Data Indonesia Pada Kantor Staf Presiden Menggunakan Comprehensive Kerbal Archieve Network (CKAN). Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi Dan Ilmu Komputer, 2(8), 2882–2888. http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.