Selection Of Employee Recruitment Based On Priority Sequence Level Assessment Using ROC Method
Main Article Content
Abstract
The organization runs a recruitment procedure to maintain the caliber of its workforce. The success or failure of a company's operations is largely determined by the success of its recruitment efforts or the acceptance of a big offer. In practice, the recruiting process frequently does not employ a selection system with predetermined evaluation criteria and an objective evaluation of each applicant. Therefore, this study applies decision-making approaches to the recruitment selection process by calculating the final alternative value using the Rank Order Centroid(ROC) method. The ROC technique can score and ascribe factors depending on the order of importance, resulting in more objective decision outcomes. The three best alternative employees that passed the selection were derived from the final computation of the alternative ranking based on five assessment factors.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Rachmat, Asia, S. N., Yusuf, M. . and Suherwin (2022) “Selection Of Employee Recruitment Based On Priority Sequence Level Assessment Using ROC Method”, Jurnal Mantik, 6(3), pp. 2918-2924. doi: 10.35335/mantik.v6i3.3008.
References
Abdullah, M. (2014). Manajemen dan evaluasi kinerja karyawan. Aswaja Pressindo.
Ahn, B. S. (2017). Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters. Omega (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.006
Anwar. (2019). Employee Performance Appraisal Analysis with Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Rating Scale Method in Baitul Mall Lhokseumawe. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 505(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012065
Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking. Acta Psychologica, 93(1–3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8
Danielson, M., & Ekenberg, L. (2017). A Robustness Study of State-of-the-Art Surrogate Weights for MCDM. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9494-6
Evita, S. N., Muizu, W. O. Z., & Atmojo, R. T. W. (2017). Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale dan Management By Objectives (Sudi kasus pada PT Qwords Company International). Pekbis Jurnal, 9(1), 18–32.
Fahrudin, D. (2020). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Menggunakan Balance Scorecard Untuk Menentukan Key Performance Indicator Di Pt Mulia Artha Anugerah. JITMI (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Dan Manajemen Industri), 3(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.32493/jitmi.v3i1.y2020.p15-23
I Gede Iwan Sudipa. (2018). Decision Support System Dengan Metode AHP, SAW dan ROC Untuk Penentuan Pemberian Beasiswa (Studi Kasus STMIK STIKOM INDONESIA). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer, 4(1), 18–30.
Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI no. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Cipta Jaya.
Kharisma, L. P. I. (2021). Sensitivitas Urutan Alternatif Keputusan Berdasarkan Prioritas Kriteria Pada Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Krisnadana, 1(1), 13–22.
Kunsch, P. L., & Ishizaka, A. (2019). A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.021
Meiryani, Siagian, P., Puspokusumo, R. A. A. W., & Lusianah. (2020). Decision making and management information systems. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 320–325. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.52
Ramli, A. H., & Yudhistira, R. (2018). Pengaruh Pengembangan Karir terhadap Kinerja Karyawan melalui Komitmen Organisasi pada PT. Infomedia Solusi Humanika di Jakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 811–816.
Rinaldi, A. D. (2021). PENGARUH REKRUTMEN, SELEKSI DAN KEMAMPUAN KERJA TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PT. ASDP INDONESIA FERRY CABANG BAKAUHENI. Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta.
Santika, P. P., & Handika, I. P. S. (2019). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENERIMAAN KARYAWAN DENGAN METODE AHP TOPSIS (Studi Kasus: PT. Global Retailindo Pratama). SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v2i1.321
Sudipa, I. G. I., & Puspitayani, I. A. D. (2019). Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria. International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering, 3(2), 85–95.
Sudipa, I. G. I., Wiguna, I. K. A. G., Asana, D. P., Putra, I. N. T. A., & Sugiartawan, P. (2022). COMBINATION OF MACBETH METHOD AND RANK ORDER CENTROID TECHNIQUES IN DETERMINING THE BEST TOURISM LOCATION IN EAST BALI. Proceeding International Conference on Information Technology, Multimedia, Architecture, Design, and E-Business, 2(0 SE-Articles).
Tangkuman, K., Tewal, B., & Trang, I. (2015). Penilaian kinerja, reward, dan punishment terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Pertamina (persero) cabang pemasaran suluttenggo. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(2).
Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Ignatius, J., & Abad, M. D. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: Application of material selection. Engineering Economics. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14005
Yeh, C., & Willis, R. J. (2001). A validation procedure for multicriteria analysis?: application to the selection of scholarship students. 6, 39–52.
Ahn, B. S. (2017). Approximate weighting method for multiattribute decision problems with imprecise parameters. Omega (United Kingdom). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2016.11.006
Anwar. (2019). Employee Performance Appraisal Analysis with Analytic Network Process (ANP) and Rating Scale Method in Baitul Mall Lhokseumawe. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 505(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012065
Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). The efficacy of SMARTER - Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking. Acta Psychologica, 93(1–3), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8
Danielson, M., & Ekenberg, L. (2017). A Robustness Study of State-of-the-Art Surrogate Weights for MCDM. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-016-9494-6
Evita, S. N., Muizu, W. O. Z., & Atmojo, R. T. W. (2017). Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Menggunakan Metode Behaviorally Anchor Rating Scale dan Management By Objectives (Sudi kasus pada PT Qwords Company International). Pekbis Jurnal, 9(1), 18–32.
Fahrudin, D. (2020). Analisis Pengukuran Kinerja Menggunakan Balance Scorecard Untuk Menentukan Key Performance Indicator Di Pt Mulia Artha Anugerah. JITMI (Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Dan Manajemen Industri), 3(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.32493/jitmi.v3i1.y2020.p15-23
I Gede Iwan Sudipa. (2018). Decision Support System Dengan Metode AHP, SAW dan ROC Untuk Penentuan Pemberian Beasiswa (Studi Kasus STMIK STIKOM INDONESIA). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer, 4(1), 18–30.
Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang RI no. 13 tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Cipta Jaya.
Kharisma, L. P. I. (2021). Sensitivitas Urutan Alternatif Keputusan Berdasarkan Prioritas Kriteria Pada Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Jurnal Krisnadana, 1(1), 13–22.
Kunsch, P. L., & Ishizaka, A. (2019). A note on using centroid weights in additive multi-criteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.021
Meiryani, Siagian, P., Puspokusumo, R. A. A. W., & Lusianah. (2020). Decision making and management information systems. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 320–325. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.52
Ramli, A. H., & Yudhistira, R. (2018). Pengaruh Pengembangan Karir terhadap Kinerja Karyawan melalui Komitmen Organisasi pada PT. Infomedia Solusi Humanika di Jakarta. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Cendekiawan, 811–816.
Rinaldi, A. D. (2021). PENGARUH REKRUTMEN, SELEKSI DAN KEMAMPUAN KERJA TERHADAP PRODUKTIVITAS KERJA KARYAWAN PT. ASDP INDONESIA FERRY CABANG BAKAUHENI. Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta.
Santika, P. P., & Handika, I. P. S. (2019). SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENERIMAAN KARYAWAN DENGAN METODE AHP TOPSIS (Studi Kasus: PT. Global Retailindo Pratama). SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal, 2(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v2i1.321
Sudipa, I. G. I., & Puspitayani, I. A. D. (2019). Analisis Sensitivitas AHP-SAW dan ROC-SAW dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria. International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering, 3(2), 85–95.
Sudipa, I. G. I., Wiguna, I. K. A. G., Asana, D. P., Putra, I. N. T. A., & Sugiartawan, P. (2022). COMBINATION OF MACBETH METHOD AND RANK ORDER CENTROID TECHNIQUES IN DETERMINING THE BEST TOURISM LOCATION IN EAST BALI. Proceeding International Conference on Information Technology, Multimedia, Architecture, Design, and E-Business, 2(0 SE-Articles).
Tangkuman, K., Tewal, B., & Trang, I. (2015). Penilaian kinerja, reward, dan punishment terhadap kinerja karyawan pada PT. Pertamina (persero) cabang pemasaran suluttenggo. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(2).
Yazdani, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Ignatius, J., & Abad, M. D. (2016). Sensitivity analysis in MADM methods: Application of material selection. Engineering Economics. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.27.4.14005
Yeh, C., & Willis, R. J. (2001). A validation procedure for multicriteria analysis?: application to the selection of scholarship students. 6, 39–52.
Copyright and Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.