Main Article Content

Indah Purnaningratri
Syairi Anwar
Dwi Endah Kurniasari
Hari Mochamad Mansur

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyse the effects of job satisfaction and work stress on shipping safety with job performance of seafarers being intervening variable. Using these variables, for instance Parker et al (2002), discovered effect job satisfaction and work stress toward job performance of seafarers to increase shipping safety. The study was conducted at Tangerang Merchant Marine Collegues (TMMC), the sample size is 93 seafarers who work in many shipping company. Data is processed using Path Analysis which assisted by application program of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 25.0. The results show that job satisfaction has directed effect to 3,24% of job performance of seafarers and work stress has directed effect to 66,59% of job performance of seafarers. While job satisfaction has indirect effect to 17,87% of shipping safety through job performance of seafarers and work stress has indirect effect to 81,03% of shipping safety through job performance of seafarers, job performance of seafarers has directed effect to 98% of shipping safety. The results from Path Analysis indicated that work stress is higher effect on job performance of seafarers than job satisfaction and job performance of seafarers is the highest directly effect on shipping safety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Purnaningratri, I., Anwar, S., Kurniasari, D. E. and Mansur, H. M. (2022) “ANALISIS KESELAMATAN PELAYARAN DITINJAU DARI KEPUASAN KERJA DAN STRES KERJA DENGAN KINERJA PELAUT SEBAGAI VARIABEL INTERVENING (STUDI PADA PELAUT ALUMNI BP2IP TANGERANG PERIOD 2014-2018)”, Jurnal Mantik, 6(2), pp. 1648-1654. Available at: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/2569 (Accessed: 11May2026).
References
[1] P. E. Spector, Industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, 2008.
[2] J. Fei and J. Lu, “Analysis of students’ perceptions of seafaring career in China based on artificial neural network and genetic programming,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 111–126, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2013.873545.
[3] J. Fenstad, Ø. Dahl, and T. Kongsvik, “Shipboard safety: exploring organizational and regulatory factors,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 552–568, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2016.1154993.
[4] G. Sulpice, Study on EU seafarers employment: final report. European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, Directorate C-Maritime Transport., 2011.
[5] J. Sánchez-Beaskoetxea and C. Coca García, “Media image of seafarers in the Spanish printed press,” Marit. Policy Manag., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 97–110, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1080/03088839.2014.925593.
[6] K. F. Yuen, H. S. Loh, Q. Zhou, and Y. D. Wong, “Determinants of job satisfaction and performance of seafarers,” Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 110, pp. 1–12, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.02.006.
[7] S. S. E. Schultz D., Theories of Personality. California: Brook/Cole Publishing Company, 2000.
[8] N. Ellis and H. Sampson, “Corporate Social Responsibility and the Quality of Seafarers Accommodation and Recreational Facilities,” in Proceedings of the International Scientific Meeting for Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Shipping, 2013, pp. 91–109.
[9] M. Kadarisman, “Kebijakan Keselamatan dan Keamanan Maritim dalam Menunjang Sistem Transportasi Laut,” J. Manaj. Transp. Logistik, vol. 4, no. 2, 2017.
[10] N. Sandjojo, Metode Analisis Jalur dan Aplikasinya, Revisi. Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Komputer Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta, 2014.