Support System In Determining Final Evaluation Supervisor And Examiner With Best Worst Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Final evaluation is a scientific work that is a requirement for students of the Politeknik Negeri Pontianak (Polnep) Business Administration Major to obtain an academic degree. As the person in charge of a final evaluation, supervisors and examiners have an important role in ensuring students are able to create a qualified final evaluation. Therefore, the diversity of titles and fields of final evaluation proposed by students needs to be combined with lecturers who have synchronized scientific disciplines and experiences. The manual determination of supervisors and examiners has the opportunity to be affiliated with subjective factors. The support system, which can essentially be used as a guide, explanation and reinforcement of a decision, has the opportunity to eliminate subjective factors that arise during decision making. The design of the support system was carried out based on five criteria that were calculated with a multi-criteria decision-making method, namely the Best Worst Method (BWM). Based on the results of system testing with 40 lecturer data and 231 student final evaluation proposal data, the support system could recommend supervisors and examiners that were in accordance with the student’s proposed final evaluation field.
Downloads
Article Details
[2] D. Pamu?ar, Ž. Stevi?, and S. Sremac, “A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM),” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 10, no. 9, p. 393, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.3390/sym10090393.
[3] S. R. Arifin and J. C. Mintamanis, “Decision Support System for Determining Thesis Supervisor using A Weighted Product (WP) Method,” J. Online Inform., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 80, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.15575/join.v3i2.230.
[4] R. A. N. Putri, A. A. Supianto, and W. Purnomo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Penentuan Dosen Pembimbing Skripsi menggunakan Algoritme Winnowing-Weighted Product,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 9132–9138, 2019.
[5] M. A. Hasan and D. Schwartz, “A Multi-criteria Decision Support System for Ph.D. Supervisor Selection: A Hybrid Approach,” in Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019, vol. 2019-Janua, pp. 1823–1832, doi: 10.24251/HICSS.2019.220.
[6] J. S. Simanungkalit, H. T. Sihotang, S. P. Nusantara, J. Iskandar, M. No, and N. Sumatra, “Decision Support System for Selection of Thesis Advisors Supervisors Thesis Advisors according to the Field of Science Using the AHP Method,” vol. 3, no. 4, 2020.
[7] S. Widaningsih, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Dosen Pembimbing Kerja Praktek Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Model Rating,” Media J. Inform., vol. 7, pp. 6–17, 2015, doi: 10.35194/mji.v7i1.133.
[8] A. Yaqin, E. Utami, and E. T. Luthfi, “Sistem pendukung keputusan penentuan dosen pembimbing dengan metode logika fuzzy,” Tek. Inform. STMIK AMIKOM Yogyakarta, pp. 146–159, 2015.
[9] J. Rezaei, “Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method,” Omega, vol. 53, pp. 49–57, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.
[10] M. I. Zulfiandri, H. Yasin, and S. Sudarno, “PEMILIHAN SMARTPHONE TERBAIK PENUNJANG KEGIATAN AKADEMIS MENGGUNAKAN METODE BWM DAN PENGEMBANGAN AHP,” J. Gaussian, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–65, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.14710/j.gauss.v10i1.30542.
[11] S. A. Torabi, R. Giahi, and N. Sahebjamnia, “An enhanced risk assessment framework for business continuity management systems,” Saf. Sci., vol. 89, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.06.015.
[12] S. Sharma, D. Sarkar, and D. Gupta, “Agile Processes and Methodologies: A Conceptual Study.,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 4, no. 5, 2012.
[13] D. Bourgeois, J. Mortati, S. Wang, and J. Smith, Information Systems for Business and Beyond (2019). 2019.
[14] J. P. Shim, M. Warkentin, J. F. Courtney, D. J. Power, R. Sharda, and C. Carlsson, “Past, present, and future of decision support technology,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 111–126, Jun. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(01)00139-7.
[15] G. R. Teisman, “Models For Research into Decision?MakingProcesses: On Phases, Streams and Decision?Making Rounds,” Public Adm., vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 937–956, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00238.
[16] Oz, Effy, Management Information Systems Sixth Edition (2009). Boston: Thomson Course Technology.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.