Main Article Content

Moh. Asep Suharna

Abstract

As a logical consequence of a joint venture, various problems arise, namely contractual problems between foreign parties and national parties in making joint venture agreements and dispute resolution issues between investors and the host country, there are doubts among foreign investors. In other words, the objectivity of the dispute resolution agency is doubtful. In Indonesia, there is a tendency for investors to choose to settle investment disputes out of court. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the joint venture agreement in terms of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment ? and problems that arise in the implementation of the joint venture agreement and how to resolve the dispute. The research method used in this research is descriptive analytical, with a normative juridical approach. This research was conducted by means of library research and field research with data collection techniques through documentation studies and interviews as well as data analysis methods used in this study using qualitative juridical analysis. Based on the results of research and discussion, the following conclusions can be drawn: First, the implementation of the joint venture agreement requires very serious handling and requires professionalism from both parties in order to avoid things that arise from the implementation of the joint venture agreement; Second, the problems that arise in the implementation of the joint venture agreement are due to the distribution of shares of 49% (national) and 51% (foreign) so that foreign companies can make important decisions because the shares are more than half, the distribution of shares is usually small, each only have only 20%, there is a transfer of shares to another party, because of dissatisfaction. The existence of these problems gives rise to investment disputes and efforts that can be made in accordance with the Capital Market Law in the form of dispute resolution by way of deliberation and consensus, arbitration or courts, and specifically for disputes between the government and foreign investors, disputes are resolved through agreed international arbitration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Suharna, M. A. (2022) “Implementation Of Joint Venture Agreement From Law Number 25 Of 2007 Concerning Investment”, Jurnal Mantik, 6(2), pp. 1307-1325. doi: 10.35335/mantik.v6i2.2481.
References
Rakhmawati, N. Rosyidah. 2003. Hukum Penanaman Modal di Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Era Global. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Nasution, Asmin. 2008. Transparansi dalam Penanaman Modal. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.
Head, John W.1997. Pengantar Umum Hukum Ekonomi. Jakarta: Proyek Elips.
H.S., Salim dan Sutrisno, Budi. 2008. Hukum Investasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Radjagukguk, Erman. 2006. Modul Hukum Investasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: FHUI.
Sembiring, Sentosa. 2010. Hukum Investasi. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.
Soekanto, Soerjono. 1986. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: UI Press.
Sumardi, 1988. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali.
Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. 1988. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Semarang: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sumardjono, Maria S.W. 1989. Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Skripsi. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM.
Muchlinski, Peter. 1997. Multinantional Enterprises and the Law. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hartono, Sunaryati. 1974. Masalah-masalah dalam Joint Venture Antara Modal Asing dan Modal Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Adolf, Huala. 2007. Dasar-dasar Hukum Kontrak Internasional. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Prasetya, Rudhi. 2016. Perseroan Terbatas: Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Rajagukguk, Erman. 2010. Penyusunan Kontrak dan Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: FH UI.
Budi Untung, Henderik 2010. Hukum Investasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Amrial, 1996. Hukum Bisnis (Deregulasi dan Joint Venture di Indonesia Teori dan Praktek). Jakarta: Djambatan.
Sumantoro, 1984. Bunga Rampai Permasalahan Penanaman Modal dan Pasar Modal. Bandung: Binacipta.
Pramono, Nindyo. 1995. Analisis Yuridis tentang Kebijaksanaan Modal Asing di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM.
Anaroga, Pandji. 1995. Perusahaan Multi Nasional: Penanaman Modal Asing. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.
Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007tentang Penanaman Modal.
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan HAM No. M-01.HT.01.01 Tahun 2008 tentang Daftar Perseroan.
A. Ridgway Delisa A. dan Talib, Mariya A. 2003. “Globalization and Development: Free Trade, Foreign Aid, Investment and The Rule of Law”, California Western International Law Journal, Vol 33, Spring 2003, h. 335.
Yulianto, Syahyu. Pertumbuhan Investasi Asing di Kepulauan Batam: Antara Dualisme Kepemimpinan dan Ketidakpastian Hukum, http://jurnal.pdii.lipi.go.id/index.php/Search.html?act= tampil&id= 45342.
Tambunan, Tulus. 2007. “Kendala Perizinan Dalam Kegiatan Penanaman Modal di Indonesia dan Upaya Perbaikan yang Perlu Dilakukan Pemerintah”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 26 No. 4, Tahun 2007, h. 35.
www.kppod.com, Diakses tanggal 10 Juli 2012, pukul 20.00 WIB.
Yulianto, Ahmad. 2003. “Peranan Multilateral investment Guarante Agency (MIGA) dalam kegiatan Investasi”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol 22, No. 5, Tahun 2003, hlm 39.
Khairandy, Ridwan. 2007. “Kompetensi Absolut Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Perusahaan Joint Venture”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol 26, No. 4, 2007, hlm. 43.
Ridwan Khairandy, 2003. “Peranan Perusahaan Penanaman Modal Asing Joint Venture Dalam Ahli Teknologi di Indonesia”, Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, Vol. 22, No. 5, Tahun 2003, hlm. 51.
Siregar, Mahmul. 2009. Hukum Investasi (Bahan Kuliah), Medan, 27 Januari 2009.