CREDIT ACCEPTANCE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM, A COMPARISON OF SAW, TOPSIS, AND SAW–TOPSIS METHODS

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: May 23, 2022
Keywords:
Decision Support System, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
Issue
Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): May: Manajemen, Teknologi Informatika dan Komunikasi (Mantik)
Section
Computer Science
Statistics Article
Article View : 112 Times

Main Article Content

I Putu Eka Sudarsana
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Abstract

This study aims to compare the three methods of Decision Support Systems in assessing/recommending the provision of business credit at the Karya Sejahtera Cooperative. The three methods are: Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), and a combination of the SAW and TOPSIS methods using five criteria, namely: Guarantee, Income, Loan Application Form, Business Establishment Permit, Land Building Tax. In addition to comparing methods, method testing was also carried out. It aims to find the most appropriate/relevant method in conducting the assessment. The test method uses the mean average precision technique which tests the accuracy of the debtor ranking. The comparison between the SAW, TOPSIS, and SAW-TOPSIS methods was tested using the mean average precision technique which shows that based on the test results of each method, the SAW - TOPSIS method is the method with the best accuracy when using the top 10 data rankings with a value of 83.7%. With a MAP test rating of 66%, the TOPSIS technique is the method with the second best accuracy when using the top 10 ranking data. In testing utilizing the MAP methodology, the SAW method had the third best accuracy when using the top 10 ranking data, with a value of 54.3%. The MAP test findings suggest that future research methods can include many methods for comparing outcomes, and the results of the calculation analysis can be further developed by adding data and being evaluated using other testing procedures to obtain different results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sudarsana, I. P. E. . (2022) “CREDIT ACCEPTANCE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM, A COMPARISON OF SAW, TOPSIS, AND SAW–TOPSIS METHODS ”, Jurnal Mantik, 6(1), pp. 502-511. Available at: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/2287 (Accessed: 21April2026).
References
Azhari, A. A., Nyura, Y., & Najib, A. (2018). Perbandingan Metode Saw dan Topsis Pada Penerimaan Siswa Praktek Kerja Lapangan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Komputer Dan Teknologi Informasi, 3(1), 71–77. El Allaki, F., Christensen, J., & Vallières, A. (2019). A modified TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) applied to choosing appropriate selection methods in ongoing surveillance for Avian Influenza in Canada. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 165(November 2018), 36– 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.02.006 Ezhilarasan, N., & Vijayalakshmi, C. (2020). Optimization of Fuzzy programming with TOPSIS Algorithm. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 473–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.144 Hendartie, S. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Metode SAW dan TOPSIS dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Calon Dosen STMIK Palangkaraya. Jurnal SAINTEKOM, 7(2), 126. https://doi.org/10.33020/saintekom.v7i2.28 Ifo Wahyu Pratama. (2018). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Evaluasi Kinerja Dosen dengan Metode Technique For Order By Similarity To Ideal Solution ( Topsis ) & Preference Ranking Organization For Evaluation ( Promethee ). XV(April), 35–42. Jiang, Y., Zhang, J., Asante, D., & Yang, Y. (2019). Dynamic evaluation of low-carbon competitiveness(LCC) based on improved Technique for Order Preference by similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method: A case study of Chinese steelworks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.054 Luijendijk, A., Hagenaars, G., Ranasinghe, R., Baart, F., Donchyts, G., & Aarninkhof, S. (2018). The State of the World’s Beaches. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24630-6 Mubarok, A., Suherman, H. D., Ramdhani, Y., & Topiq, S. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Dengan Metode TOPSIS. Jurnal Informatika, 6(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v6i1.4739 Muzakkir, I. (2017). Penerapan Metode Topsis Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Keluarga Miskin Pada Desa Panca Karsa Ii. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 9(3), 274. https://doi.org/10.33096/ilkom.v9i3.156.274-281 Na’am, J. (2017). Sebuah Tinjauan Penggunaan Metode Analythic Hierarchy Process (AHP) dalam Sistem Penunjang Keputusan (SPK) pada Jurnal Berbahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Mediasisfo, 11(2), 888–895. Ramadiani, Syahrir Ramadhani, M., Jundillah, M. L., & Azainil. (2019). Rubber plant disease diagnostic system using technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.148 Roszkowska, E., & Kacprzak, D. (2016). The fuzzy saw and fuzzy TOPSIS procedures based on ordered fuzzy numbers. Information Sciences, 369, 564–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.044 Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A. A., Ghorbani, M. A., & Shahbazi, F. (2018). Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops. Geoderma, 310(November 2016), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.012
Suka Parwita, W. G., & Winarko, E. (2015). Hybrid Recommendation System Memanfaatkan Penggalian Frequent Itemset dan Perbandingan Keyword. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 9(2), 167. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.7545 Yasdomi, K., & Amelia Chandra, D. (2017). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemberian Kredit Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus Koperasi Bengkawas Jaya). Riau Journal Of Computer Science, 3(1), 41–48.

Copyright and Licensing
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.