Analysis of Indonesian Government Public Communication based on Image Restoration Theory
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The spread of Covid-19 virus in all around the world has been happening so fast and massive. In addition, this corona virus has gotten a multidimensional crisis in the world. All countries are working hard to fight the spread of the virus either from medical side or country's policy. In Indonesia was the corona virus detected and confirmed after 4 months from the 1st case in Wuhan on November 2019. Along that 4-month period, many questions were being inquired by Indonesian legislative members about the spread of this corona virus. This journal discusses the analysis of public communication which has been performed by the Indonesian government in the face of the spreading of this Covid-19 from February to April 2020. This journal utilizes communication research which focuses on Image Restoration Theory (TIR), providing strategy in restoring image by denying strategy, evading responsibility strategy, deducting offense, corrective action and shouldering the crisis impact. he result of this research discovers that government has not been optimal to undergo the manual of crisis communication in common way, starting from confused communication message, inconsistent declaration, awkward use of social media. Eventually, government has not involved the stakeholders maximally.
Downloads
Article Details
[2] Brataas, K. (2018). Crisis Communication Case Studies and Lessons Learned from InternationalDisasters. New York City: Routledge.
[3] Bungin, Burhan. (2012). Penelitian Kualitatif; Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik, dan Ilmu Sosial lainnya. Kencana. Jakarta.
[4] Coombs, W. T & Holladay, S.J. (2010). The Handbook of Crisis Communication. United Kingdom: Blackwell.
[5] Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[6] Dijkzeul, D. &Moke, M. (2005). Public Communication Strategies of International Humanitarian Organizations. Vol. 87, No. 860. International Review of The Red Cross. R
[7] Hearit, K. M. (2006). Crisis Management by Apology: Corporate Response to Allegations of
[8] Indasari, F., &Anggriani, I. (2020). KrisisKomunikasi Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (Studi
[9] KasusPemberitaanPenyebaran Covid-19 melalui Udara). Profesional: JurnalKomunikasi Dan AdministrasiPublik, 7(1), 1–11. Retrieved Juni 15, 2021, from https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v7i1.1086
[10] Kriyantono, R. (2014). Teori Public Relations Perspektif Barat &Lokal: AplikasiPenelitian Dan Praktik. Jakarta: KencanaPrenamedia Group.
[11] Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public Relations, Issue & Crisis Management Pendekatan Critical Public Relations, EtnografiKritis&Kualitatif. Jakarta: KencanaPrenamedia Group.
[12] McLean, H. & Ewart, J. (2020). Political Leadership in Disaster and Crisis Communication and Management : International Perspective and Practices. UK: Palgrave Macmillan
[13] Mulyana, D. (2015). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
[14] Narasi Newsroom. (2020, April 11). Cuap-CuapPejabatSoal Corona | Narasi Newsroom. Retrieved September 10, 2020, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MSCDvbQye0&t=279s
[15] Neuman, W. L. (2013). MetodologiPenelitian Sosial PendekatanKualitatif dan KuantitatifEdisi 7. Jakarta: Indeks.
[16] Tubbs. L. S. (2005). Human Communication, Konteks-konteksKomunikasi. Bandung: RemajaRosdakarya.
[17] U.S. Government & Penny Hill Press Inc. (2014). Crisis Emergency Risk Communication. Georgia, United States: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
[18] Wrongdoing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[19] Yulianita, N. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Public Relations. Bandung: LPPM UNISBA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.