Method Implementation Multifactor Evaluation Process (MFEP) in Recommending the Best Types of Cattle for Beef Cattle Farming
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to implement a decision support system in recommending the best type of cow. The research data comes from interviews and field observations. Based on these observations and interviews, 5 alternatives were obtained Lemosin (A1), Simental (A2), Bali (A3), Dairy (A4), Brahma (A5), as the selected type of cow and 5 criteria for selecting cattle, namely Origin (A), Price (B), Age (C), Weight (D), and Size (E). This research uses the MFEP (Multi Factor Evaluation Process) method. From the results of research and calculations using the MFEP method, it is found that Lemosin (A1) is the best type of cow with a total weight value of 0.6875.This study aims to implement a decision support system in recommending the best type of cow. The research data comes from interviews and field observations. Based on these observations and interviews, 5 alternatives were obtained Lemosin (A1), Simental (A2), Bali (A3), Dairy (A4), Brahma (A5), as the selected type of cow and 5 criteria for selecting cattle, namely Origin (A), Price (B), Age (C), Weight (D), and Size (E). This research uses the MFEP (Multi Factor Evaluation Process) method. From the results of research and calculations using the MFEP method, it is found that Lemosin (A1) is the best type of cow with a total weight value of 0.6875.
Downloads
Article Details
[2] KOMIK (Konferensi Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2017,.
[3] D. Maharani and A. Nata, “Perbandingan Metode Mfep Dan Maut Dalam Seleksi Calon Peserta Olimpiade Sains Nasional (OSN),” vol. VI, no. 3, 2020.
[4] A. P. Silalahi and H. G. Simanullang, “Metode Multifactor Evaluation Process ( Mfep ) Untuk Rekomendasi Jurusan Pada Sekolah,” Methoda, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 84–91, 2018.
[5] I. Afrisawati, “Pemilihan Bibit Ternak Sapi Potong Melalui Kombinasi Metode Ahp Dan Metode Mfep,” vol. VI, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2019.
[6] P. Rakyat and D. I. Kabupaten, “ANALISIS KEUNTUNGAN PETERNAK SAPI POTONG BERBASIS PETERNAKAN RAKYAT DI KABUPATEN BONE Profit Analysis of Cattle Farms Based on Rural Farm in Bone Regency Hastang, Aslina Asnawi,” no. 2, pp. 240–252.
[7] D. Novianti, I. F. Astuti, and D. M. Khairina, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Web Untuk Pemilihan Café Menggunakan Metode Smart ( Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique ) ( Studi Kasus?: Kota Samarinda ),” Semin. Sains dan Teknol. FMIPA Unmul, pp. 1–5, 2016.
[8] Pratiwi, “Penerapan Smart System Sebagai Metode Pengukuran Kinerja Perusahaan (Studi Kasus Pada Ukm Hentoro Leather),” Univ. Gunadarma, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2014.
[9] D. S. Sinaga et al., “Analisa Metode SMART Dalam Merekomendasikan Peserta UKK Jurusan TKJ,” no. x, pp. 1–10, 2012.
[10] Yeni Kustiyahningsih and N. Syafa’ah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Jurusan Pada Siswa Sma Menggunakan Metode Knn Dan Smart,” Jsii, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2014..
[11] N. Sesnika, D. Andreswari, and R. Efendi, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Gedung Serba Guna Di Kota Bengkulu Dengan Menggunakan Metode Smart Berbasis Android,” J. Rekursif, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–44, 2016.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.