Main Article Content

Dhera
Deci Irmayani
Angga Putra Juledi

Abstract

It is a daunting challenge to assess the accuracy of student learning quality. Many considerations must be taken into consideration when determining the accuracy of the degree of student learning efficiency. These criteria use to assess students' ability to learn consistently. Since there are so many ways to satisfy this criteria, deciding on the consistency standard of learning scores is problematic. The SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) process solves different parameters of decision-making problems. The SAW method is a multi-criteria decision-making method founded on the idea that the chosen solution must satisfy all criteria. The SAW technique is a multi-criteria decision-making approach based on the optimal option, which would be the nearest to the ideal solution while being the furthest from the negative ideal solution. Calculating the normalization matrix, weighted normalization matrix, comparing the positive and negative ideal solutions, calculating the separation distance for each alternative ideal solution, and calculating the value of each alternative's preference are all steps in the SAW method. The following table displays the results of the SAW process calculation protocol. The information comes from a decision-making framework that distinguishes students who excel in their studies. Bunga Adelia Azahara received a 0.908, while Fadila Dwi Ranti received a 0.932.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dhera, Deci Irmayani and Angga Putra Juledi (2021) “Analysis of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Methods to Determine The Quality of Student Learning SMK Siti Banun”, Jurnal Mantik, 5(1), pp. 51-57. doi: 10.35335/mantik.Vol5.2021.1263.pp51-57.
References
[1] y. Marryono jamun, “dampak teknologi terhadap pendidikan,” j. Pendidik. Dan kebud. Missio, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 48–52, jan. 2018.
[2] f. Dola syamsu, k. Hadi, and a. Razab, “meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran dengan pendekatan berbasis saintifik pada materi keanekaragaman hayati,” bionatural j. Ilm. Pendidik. Biol., vol. 7, no. 2, sep. 2020.
[3] r. Kania, r. Effendi, and a. Risdiansyah, “sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan karyawan teladan di universitas banten jaya menggunakan metode simple additive weighting (saw),” j. Sist. Inf. Dan inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 57–72, 2021, doi: 10.47080/simika.v4i1.1186.
[4] m. Hatta, “implementasi metode simple additive weighting pada sistem dss seleksi penerimaan beasiswa perguruan height,” j. Ilm. Intech inf. Technol. J. Umus, vol. 2, no. 01, pp. 31–40, may 2020, doi: 10.46772/intech.v2i01.184.
[5] a. Setya putra, d. Rahma aryanti, and i. Hartati, “seminar nasional teknologi dan bisnis 2018 iib darmajaya bandar lampung,” in prosiding seminar nasional darmajaya, nov. 2018, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 85–97, [online]. Available: https://jurnal.darmajaya.ac.id/index.php/psnd/article/view/1233.
[6] h. A. Pradana, f. Fitriyani, and m. Marisa, “pengambilan keputusan pemilihan sekolah dasar islam menggunakan metode saw dan fmadm di pangkalpinang,” j. Sisfokom (sistem inf. Dan komputer), vol. 9, no. 1, p. 132, apr. 2020, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v9i1.840.
[7] t. Elizabeth, “sistem pendukung keputusan pemilihan asisten dosen menggunakan metode saw,” jatisi (jurnal tek. Inform. Dan sist. Informasi), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–80, apr. 2020, doi: 10.35957/jatisi.v7i1.221.
[8] e. Ismanto and n. Effendi, “sistem pendukung keputusan penerimaan karyawan dengan metode simple additive weighting (saw),” satin - sains dan teknol. Inf., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1, jun. 2017, doi: 10.33372/stn.v3i1.208.