Main Article Content

Aisyah Nuraeni
Toto Suharto

Abstract

Information technology governance self–assessment application aims to align the evaluation process that requires a large enough resource both in human resources, cost, and time. By knowing the portrait of information technology governance conditions, a City can control the information technology investment that has been issued so that it is in line with the goals of the City and supports the implementation of a Smart City. The research method used is a qualitative method with COBIT 5 as the Information Technology Governance Evaluation framework. Meanwhile, the software development method used is Rapid Application Development (RAD) with the Unified Modeling Language (UML) design model. The result obtained is a ranking of the maturity level of information technology governance with application media as a means of collecting assessment data so that it can help improve the efficiency of the implementation of Information Technology Governance Evaluation in Cities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nuraeni, A. and Suharto, T. . (2020) “Information Technology Governance Self-Assessment Application Using Cobit 5 for Supporting Smart Cities”, Jurnal Mantik, 4(3), pp. 2094-2099. Available at: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/1093 (Accessed: 25April2026).
References
[1] Greco, Ilaria & Cresta, Angela. (2015). A Smart Planning for Smart City: The Concept of Smart City as an Opportunity to Re-think the Planning Models of the Contemporary City. 563-576. 10.1007/978-3-319-21407-8_40.
[2] A. Nuraeni, H. S. Firmansyah, G. S. Pribadi, A. Munandar, L. Herdiani and Nurwathi, "Smart City Evaluation Model in Bandung, West Java, Indonesia," 2019 IEEE 13th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA), Bali, Indonesia, 2019, pp. 228-234, doi: 10.1109/TSSA48701.2019.8985465.
[3] El Hendy, Mahmoud & Miniaoui, Sami & Atalla, Shadi & Hashim, Kamarul. (2017). A survey on smart city technologies, initiatives and global technology providers. 1-7. 10.1145/3018896.3025132. ISACA. (2012). COBIT 5 for Information Security, ISACA, United States of America.
[4] ISACA. (2012). COBIT 5 for Information Security, ISACA, United States of America.
[5] Lorences, Patricia & García-Ávila, Lourdes. (2013). The Evaluation and Improvement of IT Governance. JISTEM - Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management. 10. 219-234. 10.4301/S1807-17752013000200002.
[6] Setiawan, Ari & Andry, Johanes. (2019). IT GOVERNANCE EVALUATION USING COBIT 5 FRAMEWORK ON THE NATIONAL LIBRARY. Jurnal Sistem Informasi. 15. 10-17. 10.21609/jsi.v15i1.790.
[7] Nuraeni, A. (2020). Penilaian Kondisi Eksisting Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Pada Perangkat Daerah Menggunakan Cobit 5. Jurnal TIARSIE, 17(1), 1-6. doi:10.32816/tiarsie.v17i1.77
[8] Pressman, Roger S. 2010. Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach / Roger S. Pressman. — 7th ed. McGraw Hill Higher Education.
[9] Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D.Bandung: Afabeta.
[10] UML.2005. Introduction to omg's Unified Modeling Languange. https://www.uml.org/what-is-uml.htm. Accessed 12 September 2020 at 16.34.
[11] Roger Pressman and Bruce Maxim. 2019. Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach 9th Edition. McGraw Hill Higher Education.
[12] Surabaya, 2020. Web resmi kota surabaya tentang perangkat daerah https://surabaya.go.id/id/page/0/8004/rincian-laporan-realisasi-anggaran-%28lra%29-satuan-kerja-perangkat-daerah-%28skpd%29-tahun-2011dst. Accessed 14 October 2020 at 20.08 WIB.