Gross Domestic Regional Product Reconciliation and Compilation Application Development in Sulawesi Selatan
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
GDRP compilation in Indonesia is carried out using a mixed method between the top-bottom and bottom-up methods. The use of these methods resulted in inevitable statistical discrepancies. Regencies/municipalities GDRP reconciliation along with province is carried out annually to maintain the value of these statistical discrepancies. The collection/compilation of main tables of GDRP of regencies/municipalities along with provinces is still carried out in the conventional way, as well as in the reconciliation process. The development of information technology and e-Government encourages the implementation of information technology to increase the effectivity and efficiency of internal operations in the government, including the compilation and reconciliation process of this GDRP. Application development with the prototyping method for the compilation and reconciliation process can be a solution to conventional methods that are still in use. The GDRP reconciliation and compilation application that was built has been used by the BPS-Statistics of Sulawesi Selatan Provinceand can be duplicated elsewhere.
Downloads
Article Details
[2] Eurostat, Manual on Regional Accounts Methods, 2013 Edition. European Union, 2013.
[3] S. Mabutho and R. Durrel, “Influence of Information Technology on Organization Strategy,” vol. 9, pp. 191–202, 2017, doi: 10.1515/fman-2017-0015.
[4] R. P. Pradhan, G. Mallik, and T. P. Bagchi, “Information Communication Technology (ICT) Infrastructure and Economic Growth: A Causality Evinced by Cross-Country Panel Data,” IIMB Manag. Rev., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 91–103, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2018.01.001.
[5] A. Setiawan and E. Yulianto, “E-Government Interoperability and Integration Architecture Modeling Using TOGAF Framework Based On Service Oriented Architecture,” 2018, doi: 10.12695/ajtm.2018.11.1.3.
[6] S. Verma, “Analysis of Strengths and Weakness of SDLC Models,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Manag. Stud., vol. 7782, pp. 235–240, 2014.
[7] M. A. Rather, V. Bhatnagar, and S. Verma, “A Comprative Study of SDLC Model,” Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Manag. Stud., vol. 7782, no. August, pp. 235–240, 2016.
[8] R. Susanto and A. D. Andriana, “Perbandingan Model Waterfall dan Prototyping untuk Pengembangan Sistem Informasi,” Maj. Ilm. Unikom, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2016.
[9] S. Dogan, A. Betin-can, and V. Garousi, “Web Application Testing: A Systematic Literature Review,” no. May, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.01.010.
[10] D. Kunda and A. Siame, “Evolution of PHP Applications: A Systematic Literature Review,” vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 28–39, 2017.
[11] K. Benmoussa, M. Laaziri, S. Khoulji, M. L. Kerkeb, and A. El Yamami, “A New Model for The Selection of Web Development Frameworks: Application to PHP Frameworks,” no. January, pp. 695–703, 2019, doi: 10.11591/ijece.v9i1.pp695-703.
[12] N. A. Haris and N. Hasim, “PHP Frameworks Usability in Web Application Development,” no. October, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijrte.C1020.1083S19.
[13] P. Romhadhoni, D. Z. Faizah, and N. Afifah, “Pengaruh Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) Daerah Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Tingkat Pengangguran Terbuka di Provinsi DKI Jakarta,” vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 115–121, 2018, doi: 10.24198/jmi.v14.n2.2018.115-121.
[14] F. Ciccozzi, I. Malavolta, and B. Selic, “Execution of UML Models: a Systematic Review of Research and Practice,” Softw. Syst. Model., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 2313–2360, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s10270-018-0675-4.
[15] S. Sabharwal, P. Kaur, and R. Sibal, “Empirical and Theoretical Validation of a Use Case Diagram Complexity Metric,” no. November, 2017, doi: 10.5815/ijitcs.2017.11.04.
[16] T. Ahmad, J. Iqbal, A. Ashraf, D. Truscan, and I. Porres, “Model-Based Testing Using UML Activity Diagrams: A Systematic Mapping Study,” no. July, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2019.07.001.