Implementation of the principle of presumption of innocence of suspects in investigations, pre-trial and trial examinations
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The principle of presumption of innocence is a fundamental legal principle in the justice system to protect the rights of suspects. Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (KUHAP) Article 66 of the Criminal Procedure Code explains "every person suspected of committing a criminal act is deemed innocent, until a court decision is made that has permanent legal force." This means that as long as the decision has not been changed, the defendant or suspect cannot be blamed. The application of the principle of presumption of innocence has become the main basis in the modern justice system to guarantee justice and protect individual rights. This article explores the significance and implementation of the presumption of innocence in the context of protecting the rights of suspects in the justice system. Through an overview of the literature and context analysis, this article outlines the basic principles of the principle of presumption that brings truth and its influence on the process of examining disputes. Apart from that, this article also discusses the challenges and efforts to ensure the effective implementation of the principle of presumption of illegality in legal practice.
Article Details
Agustina, A., & Riyadi, S. (2020). (n.d.). .
Arief Amrullah, M., Gede Widhiana Suarda, I., Situbondo, S., & Java Indonesia, E. (n.d.). Pretrial In Indonesian Criminal Law. Retrieved from https://ijersc.org
Coleman, M. (2020). (n.d.). .
Faisal, F. (2023). Due Process of Law: Pre-trial and Preliminary Examination Judge on Indonesian Criminal Procedure Law. Scholars International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6(03), 154–158. SASPR Edu International Pvt. Ltd.
Galagan, V. I., Ablamskyi, S. Ye., Udovenko, Z. V., & Ablamska, V. V. (2021). Judicial Control as a Guarantee of Non-Interference in Private Life During the Pretrial Investigation. DIXI, 23(2), 1–18. Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia- UCC.
Gede Atmadja, D. (2018). ASAS-ASAS HUKUM DALAM SISTEM HUKUM, 12(2), 145–155. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.22225/kw.12.2.721.145-155
Halabi, S. G., & Markovits, A. R. (n.d.). Journal of Legal Studies, Humanities and Political Sciences|https://sadijournals.org/index.php/jlshps FROM SUSPICION TO JUSTICE: REFRAMING INVESTIGATION WARRANT PROCEDURES FOR SUSPECTS’ RIGHTS. Number, 3(10). Retrieved from https://sadijournals.org/index.php/jlshps|editorial@sadijournals.orghttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8239115
Hamdi Laiya, M., & Insani, N. (2023). Juridical Study of Judges’ Considerations in Deciding Pretrial Applications. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP), 7(4), 2598–9944.
Hukum, J. J., Keadilan, D., Anita, F., & Haryati, S. (2021). ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH DALAM PENYELENGARAAN PERADILAN PIDANA, 8.
Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, F., & Pangaribuan, A. (2016). Al-Risalah PARADOKS ASAS PRADUGA TIDAK BERSALAH THE PARADOX OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE PRINCIPLE, 16(2), 169–185.
Kazakh, A.-F. (n.d.). ??-?????? ???????? ????? ?????? ???????????? ??????? ??? ??????? ????????? ???????????? ??????????? ????? ???-?????? ??????? ????? ???????????.
Kumendong, W. J. (2017). (n.d.). .
Luter, A., Sinaulan, R. L., & Ismed, M. (2022). PRE-TRIAL: THE SUSPECTS’ ULTIMATE WEAPON AND CORRECTION TOOL FOR INVESTIGATORS TO BE MORE PROFESSIONAL FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL EXPEDIENCY. LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) (Vol. 1). Retrieved from https://ojs.transpublika.com/index.php/POLRI/
Made, I., Kusuma, W. W., Sepud, M., Made, N., & Karma, S. (2020). UPAYA HUKUM PRAPERADILAN DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI INDONESIA, 1(2).
Metode Penelitian Hukum TEORI & PRAKTEK. (n.d.). .
Praperadilan Sebagai Control Profesionalisme Kinerja Penyidik Arhjayati Rahim Abstrak. (n.d.). .
Pura, M. H., & Kartika, R. Y. (2018). (n.d.). .
Putri, A., & Sari, K. (n.d.). PENERAPAN ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH TERHADAP TERSANGKA DALAM PROSES PENYIDIKAN (Studi Kasus di Kepolisian Resort Palu).
Saktiawan, M. G. (2016). (n.d.). .
Sari, N. (n.d.). TRIAL BY THE PRESS TERHADAP PROSES PERADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM PERSPEKTIF ASAS PRADUGA TIDAK BERSALAH.
Schinggyt Tryan, M. P., & Serikat Putrajaya, N. (2016). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKSANAAN ASAS PRADUGA TAK BERSALAH DALAM PROSES PERADILAN PIDANA. DIPONEGORO LAW JOURNAL (Vol. 5).
Tindak Pidana Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan, M. (n.d.). ASAS-ASAS HUKUM PIDANA.
Tumbur, F., Napitupulu, J., & Firmansyah, H. (2022). The Implementation of Article 77 KUHAP Regarding Status of Suspects in Pre-Trial Criminal Justice System in Indonesia.
Wiguna, A. A. P. S., Sepud, I. M., & Sujana, I. N. (2020). Hak-Hak Tersangka (Miranda Rule) pada Tahap Penyidikan dalam Kitab UU Hukum Acara Pidana. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 1(1), 51–56. Universitas Warmadewa.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.