Citizen and Netizen Society: The Meaning of Social Change From a Technology Point of View
Article Sidebar
Published:
Oct 16, 2021
Keywords:
Society 5.0, Citizen, Netizen, Social Change
Section
Computer Science
Statistics Article
Article View : 3365 Times
Main Article Content
Abstract
Technological developments in the era of society 5.0 require that society be divided into two types, firstly citizen society, which means people who are free to express their opinions in public, while netizens are people who are active on the internet and are present in online communities. Social changes occur as a result of technological developments that change social structures and interactions between communities which result in a shift in norm values ??in society, this study aims to explain the meaning of social change from a technological point of view, this study uses a qualitative approach with literature studies related to citizens, netizens and change social. The results of the study explain that social changes that occur among citizens are freedom of expression in the public space so that technology has an impact for them to actualize themselves, while the netizen community changes the interaction process that prioritizes information technology and shifts values ??and norms in society and has negative and positive impacts.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Achmad, W. (2021) “Citizen and Netizen Society: The Meaning of Social Change From a Technology Point of View”, Jurnal Mantik, 5(3), pp. 1564-1570. Available at: https://iocscience.org/ejournal/index.php/mantik/article/view/1663 (Accessed: 10May2026).
References
[1] Achmad, W. RW (2021). Conflict Resolution of Remote Indigenous Communities (Overview of The Sociology Communication). LEGAL BRIEF, 10 (2), 280–286.
[2] Albert, A., Balázs, B., Butkevi?ien?, E., Mayer, K., & Perelló, J. (2021). Citizen social science: new and established approaches to participation in social research. Chapter 7. In: Vohland K. et al.(Eds). 2021. The Science of Citizen Science. Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4. pp: 119-138.
[3] Ardelia, R., & Anwarudin, O. (2020). Akses teknologi informasi melalui media elektronik pada petani KRPL. Jurnal Triton, 11(1), 24-36.
[4] Billore, S. (2021). Cultural Consumption and Citizen Engagement—Strategies for Built Heritage Conservation and Sustainable Development. A Case Study of Indore City, India. Sustainability, 13(5), 2878.
[5] Budiyono, B. (2020). Inovasi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran di Era Revolusi 4.0. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 300-309.
[6] Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Publiciana, 9(1), 140-157.
[7] Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Publiciana, 9(1), 140-157.
[8] Chachage, C. (2010). From Citizenship to Netizenship: Blogging for social change in Tanzania. Development, 53(3), 429-432.
[9] Chang, L. Y., Zhong, L. Y., & Grabosky, P. N. (2018). Citizen co production of cyber security: Self?help, vigilantes, and cybercrime. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 101-114.
[10] Chen, M., Sinha, A., Hu, K., & Shah, M. I. (2021). Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120521.
[11] Cooper, C. B., Hawn, C. L., Larson, L. R., Parrish, J. K., Bowser, G., Cavalier, D., ... & Wilson, S. (2021). Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549), 1386-1388.
[12] Dharmawan, A. (2015). Kritik netizen terhadap nekrokultura media mainstream (Studi demokrasi partisipan weblog Kompasiana). JURNAL SIMBOLIKA: Research and Learning in Communication Study, 1(1).
[13] Firdaos, R. (2015). Orientasi Pedagogik Dan Perubahan Sosial Budaya Terhadap Kemajuan Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Teknologi. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 106-117.
[14] Formenti, C. (2012). Web 2.0: netizen empowerment vs. unpaid labor. Journal of Science Communication, 11(1), C03.
[15] Frennert, S. (2021). Hitting a moving target: digital transformation and welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(1), 103-111.
[16] Gamayanto, I., & Nilawati, F. E. (2017). Pengembangan dan implementasi dari wise netizen (e-comment) di Indonesia. techno.com, 16(1), 80-95.
[17] Goi, C. L. (2009). Cyberculture: Impacts on netizen. Asian Culture and History, 1(2), 140.
[18] Hifzul Muiz, M., & Sumarni, N. (2020). Pengaruh Teknologi Pembelajaran Kuliah Online Di Era Covid-19 Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Mental Mahasiswa. EduTeach: Jurnal Edukasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 153-165.
[19] Jacobsen, K. L. (2010). Making design safe for citizens: A hidden history of humanitarian experimentation. Citizenship Studies, 14(1), 89-103.
[20] Kuo, Y. F., Hou, J. R., & Hsieh, Y. H. (2021). The advertising communication effectiveness of using netizen language code-switching in Facebook ads. Internet Research.
[21] Maimunah, M., Septiani, M., Nurzaelani, M. M., & Suartika, I. (2020). Pengembangan blended learning pada mata kuliah Pendidikan Lingkungan Sosial Budaya dan Teknologi. Ta'dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 225-243.
[22] Managi, S., Lindner, R., & Stevens, C. C. (2021). Technology policy for the sustainable development goals: From the global to the local level.
[23] Maulida, H. (2020). Kredibilitas Komunikator Jurus Sehat Rasulullah Di Kalangan Followers Instagram@ Zaidulakbar. Jurnal Dakwah Risalah, 31(1), 1-20.
[24] Maulida, H., & Nugrahenti, M. C. (2019). Edukasi Hukum Dan Etika Bermedia Sosial Bagi Gen Z. Amal Ilmiah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 115-122.
[25] Ngafifi, M. (2014). Kemajuan teknologi dan pola hidup manusia dalam perspektif sosial budaya. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2(1).
[26] Nurmandi, A., Purnomo, E. P., Prianto, A. L., & Jaenuri, M. (2015). The current practice of citizen participation in Indonesia netizen and selected cases of local democracy in Indonesia. Citizen Participation, 21.
[27] Piliang, Y. A. (2012). Masyarakat informasi dan digital: Teknologi informasi dan perubahan sosial. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 11(27), 143-155.
[28] Poluakan, M. V., Dikayuana, D., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2019). Potret Generasi Milenial pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 187-197.
[29] Pontones-Rosa, C., Pérez-Morote, R., & Santos-Peñalver, J. F. (2021). ICT-based public policies and depopulation in hollowed-out Spain: A survey analysis on the digital divide and citizen satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120811.
[30] Purwasito, A. (2018). Netizen Civilization. Atlantiss Prees.
[31] Rafiq, A. (2020). Dampak Media Sosial Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Suatu Masyarakat. Global Komunika, 1(1), 18-29.
[32] Ritonga, R., & Syahputra, I. (2019). Citizen journalism and public participation in the era of new media in Indonesia: From street to tweet. Media and Communication, 7(3), 79-90.
[33] Sahay, A. (2015). From Citizen to Netizen. Business Today in.
[34] Servaes, L., & Servaes, J. (2021). Participatory communication for social change. In Handbook of Communication and Development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[35] Shao, Y. (2021). From Netizen to Citizen: Netizen Empowerment and Political Activism among Chinese Americans (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside).
[36] Sidiq, R. S. S., Jalil, A., & Achmad, R. W. W. (2021). Virtual World Solidarity: How Social Solidarity is Built on the Crowdfunding Platform Kitabisa.com. Webology, 18(1), 192-202.
[37] Simarmata, J., Chaerul, M., Mukti, R. C., Purba, D. W., Tamrin, A. F., Jamaludin, J., & Meganingratna, A. (2020). Teknologi Informasi: Aplikasi dan Penerapannya. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
[38] Tan, X., Dou, X., Zhang, Y., Xing, C., Bai, B., & Miao, R. (2021). The Structural Dilemma of Citizen Participation: The Interactive Influence of Social Status and Subjective Social Mobility. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 18344909211003169.
[39] Tufte, T. (2017). Communication and social change: A citizen perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
[40] Yanis, M. (2020). Pengaruh Teknologi Pertanian Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Petani Padi Sawah (Suatu Penelitian Di Kemukiman Glee Yeung Kecamatan Kuta Cot Glie, Kabupaten Aceh Besar). ETD Unsyiah.
[41] Yoga, S. (2019). Perubahan Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Indonesia dan Perkembangan Teknologi Komunikasi. Jurnal Al-Bayan: Media Kajian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Dakwah, 24(1).
[42] Younis, A., Xiaobao, P., Nadeem, M. A., Kanwal, S., Pitafi, A. H., Qiong, G., & Yuzhen, D. (2021). Impact of positivity and empathy on social entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of perceived social support. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2124.
[43] Yuliansyah, Y. (2016). Meningkatkan Response Rate Pada Penelitian Survey Suatu Study Literature.
[44] Zhu, X. (2016). In the name of ‘Citizens’: civic activism and policy entrepreneurship of Chinese public intellectuals in the Hu–Wen era. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(101), 745-759.
[45] Zuriah, N., Syaifuddin, M., & Taufik, M. (2018). Reconstruction of Character Education Model in Higher Education through Project Netizen I Love Products Indonesian.
[2] Albert, A., Balázs, B., Butkevi?ien?, E., Mayer, K., & Perelló, J. (2021). Citizen social science: new and established approaches to participation in social research. Chapter 7. In: Vohland K. et al.(Eds). 2021. The Science of Citizen Science. Springer. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4. pp: 119-138.
[3] Ardelia, R., & Anwarudin, O. (2020). Akses teknologi informasi melalui media elektronik pada petani KRPL. Jurnal Triton, 11(1), 24-36.
[4] Billore, S. (2021). Cultural Consumption and Citizen Engagement—Strategies for Built Heritage Conservation and Sustainable Development. A Case Study of Indore City, India. Sustainability, 13(5), 2878.
[5] Budiyono, B. (2020). Inovasi Pemanfaatan Teknologi Sebagai Media Pembelajaran di Era Revolusi 4.0. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 300-309.
[6] Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Publiciana, 9(1), 140-157.
[7] Cahyono, A. S. (2016). Pengaruh media sosial terhadap perubahan sosial masyarakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Publiciana, 9(1), 140-157.
[8] Chachage, C. (2010). From Citizenship to Netizenship: Blogging for social change in Tanzania. Development, 53(3), 429-432.
[9] Chang, L. Y., Zhong, L. Y., & Grabosky, P. N. (2018). Citizen co production of cyber security: Self?help, vigilantes, and cybercrime. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 101-114.
[10] Chen, M., Sinha, A., Hu, K., & Shah, M. I. (2021). Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, 120521.
[11] Cooper, C. B., Hawn, C. L., Larson, L. R., Parrish, J. K., Bowser, G., Cavalier, D., ... & Wilson, S. (2021). Inclusion in citizen science: The conundrum of rebranding. Science, 372(6549), 1386-1388.
[12] Dharmawan, A. (2015). Kritik netizen terhadap nekrokultura media mainstream (Studi demokrasi partisipan weblog Kompasiana). JURNAL SIMBOLIKA: Research and Learning in Communication Study, 1(1).
[13] Firdaos, R. (2015). Orientasi Pedagogik Dan Perubahan Sosial Budaya Terhadap Kemajuan Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Teknologi. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 106-117.
[14] Formenti, C. (2012). Web 2.0: netizen empowerment vs. unpaid labor. Journal of Science Communication, 11(1), C03.
[15] Frennert, S. (2021). Hitting a moving target: digital transformation and welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(1), 103-111.
[16] Gamayanto, I., & Nilawati, F. E. (2017). Pengembangan dan implementasi dari wise netizen (e-comment) di Indonesia. techno.com, 16(1), 80-95.
[17] Goi, C. L. (2009). Cyberculture: Impacts on netizen. Asian Culture and History, 1(2), 140.
[18] Hifzul Muiz, M., & Sumarni, N. (2020). Pengaruh Teknologi Pembelajaran Kuliah Online Di Era Covid-19 Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Mental Mahasiswa. EduTeach: Jurnal Edukasi Dan Teknologi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 153-165.
[19] Jacobsen, K. L. (2010). Making design safe for citizens: A hidden history of humanitarian experimentation. Citizenship Studies, 14(1), 89-103.
[20] Kuo, Y. F., Hou, J. R., & Hsieh, Y. H. (2021). The advertising communication effectiveness of using netizen language code-switching in Facebook ads. Internet Research.
[21] Maimunah, M., Septiani, M., Nurzaelani, M. M., & Suartika, I. (2020). Pengembangan blended learning pada mata kuliah Pendidikan Lingkungan Sosial Budaya dan Teknologi. Ta'dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 225-243.
[22] Managi, S., Lindner, R., & Stevens, C. C. (2021). Technology policy for the sustainable development goals: From the global to the local level.
[23] Maulida, H. (2020). Kredibilitas Komunikator Jurus Sehat Rasulullah Di Kalangan Followers Instagram@ Zaidulakbar. Jurnal Dakwah Risalah, 31(1), 1-20.
[24] Maulida, H., & Nugrahenti, M. C. (2019). Edukasi Hukum Dan Etika Bermedia Sosial Bagi Gen Z. Amal Ilmiah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 115-122.
[25] Ngafifi, M. (2014). Kemajuan teknologi dan pola hidup manusia dalam perspektif sosial budaya. Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi, 2(1).
[26] Nurmandi, A., Purnomo, E. P., Prianto, A. L., & Jaenuri, M. (2015). The current practice of citizen participation in Indonesia netizen and selected cases of local democracy in Indonesia. Citizen Participation, 21.
[27] Piliang, Y. A. (2012). Masyarakat informasi dan digital: Teknologi informasi dan perubahan sosial. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 11(27), 143-155.
[28] Poluakan, M. V., Dikayuana, D., Wibowo, H., & Raharjo, S. T. (2019). Potret Generasi Milenial pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 187-197.
[29] Pontones-Rosa, C., Pérez-Morote, R., & Santos-Peñalver, J. F. (2021). ICT-based public policies and depopulation in hollowed-out Spain: A survey analysis on the digital divide and citizen satisfaction. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120811.
[30] Purwasito, A. (2018). Netizen Civilization. Atlantiss Prees.
[31] Rafiq, A. (2020). Dampak Media Sosial Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Suatu Masyarakat. Global Komunika, 1(1), 18-29.
[32] Ritonga, R., & Syahputra, I. (2019). Citizen journalism and public participation in the era of new media in Indonesia: From street to tweet. Media and Communication, 7(3), 79-90.
[33] Sahay, A. (2015). From Citizen to Netizen. Business Today in.
[34] Servaes, L., & Servaes, J. (2021). Participatory communication for social change. In Handbook of Communication and Development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
[35] Shao, Y. (2021). From Netizen to Citizen: Netizen Empowerment and Political Activism among Chinese Americans (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Riverside).
[36] Sidiq, R. S. S., Jalil, A., & Achmad, R. W. W. (2021). Virtual World Solidarity: How Social Solidarity is Built on the Crowdfunding Platform Kitabisa.com. Webology, 18(1), 192-202.
[37] Simarmata, J., Chaerul, M., Mukti, R. C., Purba, D. W., Tamrin, A. F., Jamaludin, J., & Meganingratna, A. (2020). Teknologi Informasi: Aplikasi dan Penerapannya. Yayasan Kita Menulis.
[38] Tan, X., Dou, X., Zhang, Y., Xing, C., Bai, B., & Miao, R. (2021). The Structural Dilemma of Citizen Participation: The Interactive Influence of Social Status and Subjective Social Mobility. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 15, 18344909211003169.
[39] Tufte, T. (2017). Communication and social change: A citizen perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
[40] Yanis, M. (2020). Pengaruh Teknologi Pertanian Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Petani Padi Sawah (Suatu Penelitian Di Kemukiman Glee Yeung Kecamatan Kuta Cot Glie, Kabupaten Aceh Besar). ETD Unsyiah.
[41] Yoga, S. (2019). Perubahan Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Indonesia dan Perkembangan Teknologi Komunikasi. Jurnal Al-Bayan: Media Kajian dan Pengembangan Ilmu Dakwah, 24(1).
[42] Younis, A., Xiaobao, P., Nadeem, M. A., Kanwal, S., Pitafi, A. H., Qiong, G., & Yuzhen, D. (2021). Impact of positivity and empathy on social entrepreneurial intention: The moderating role of perceived social support. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(1), e2124.
[43] Yuliansyah, Y. (2016). Meningkatkan Response Rate Pada Penelitian Survey Suatu Study Literature.
[44] Zhu, X. (2016). In the name of ‘Citizens’: civic activism and policy entrepreneurship of Chinese public intellectuals in the Hu–Wen era. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(101), 745-759.
[45] Zuriah, N., Syaifuddin, M., & Taufik, M. (2018). Reconstruction of Character Education Model in Higher Education through Project Netizen I Love Products Indonesian.
Copyright and Licensing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.